TY  - BOOK
AU  - Mandić, Goran
AU  - Putnik, Nenad
AU  - Milošević, Mladen
PY  - 2017
UR  - https://rhinosec.fb.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/357
PB  - Univerzitet u Beogradu, Fakultet bezbednosti, Beograd
T1  - Zaštita podataka i socijalni inženjering - pravni, organizacioni i bezbednosni aspekti
ER  - 

@book{
author = "Mandić, Goran and Putnik, Nenad and Milošević, Mladen",
year = "2017",
publisher = "Univerzitet u Beogradu, Fakultet bezbednosti, Beograd",
title = "Zaštita podataka i socijalni inženjering - pravni, organizacioni i bezbednosni aspekti"
}

Mandić, G., Putnik, N.,& Milošević, M.. (2017). Zaštita podataka i socijalni inženjering - pravni, organizacioni i bezbednosni aspekti. 
Univerzitet u Beogradu, Fakultet bezbednosti, Beograd..

Mandić G, Putnik N, Milošević M. Zaštita podataka i socijalni inženjering - pravni, organizacioni i bezbednosni aspekti. 2017;..

Mandić, Goran, Putnik, Nenad, Milošević, Mladen, "Zaštita podataka i socijalni inženjering - pravni, organizacioni i bezbednosni aspekti" (2017).

TY  - CHAP
AU  - Mandić, Goran
AU  - Putnik, Nenad
AU  - Milošević, Mladen
PY  - 2017
UR  - https://rhinosec.fb.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/345
AB  - The purpose of this paper is to establish a terminological framework in order to explain social engineering and analyze it from phenomenological and security aspect. From phenomenological point of view, the paper explains the phenomenon of social engineering as a contemporary, specific and sophisticated manner of manipulating people. Social engineering is characterized by attacker’s innovative method of selecting and approaching the victim and, when needed, an unlimited number of attack cycles, depending on the goal set by the attacker. Attacks are based on the use of various tools and techniques. From the aspect of security, social engineering holds a very important place in planning and executing cyber-attacks. This paper analyzes perpetrators’ criminogenic and motivational factors from the criminological point of view. Motive and profile of perpetrators cannot always be established due to spatial and temporal limitations, as well as architectural and environmental characteristics of the information and communication system, which is the final target of the attacks. Regardless of the fact that it is present in each phase of a cyber-attack, social engineering is always the foundation of the first phase, in which the attacker learns in details the information which will facilitate access to the information and communication system he plans to attack. In this initial and crucial phase, preconditions for successful continuation and termination of the cyber-attack are realized. At the end of the paper, there is a detailed classification of threat subjects based on motives that moves them and the goal that is supposed to be achieved. In the scientific and professional thematization, this has not been done yet.
PB  - Nova Science Publishers, Inc.
T2  - Security Risks: Assessment, Management and Current Challenges
T1  - Contemporary deception techniques: Social engineering – semantic, phenomenological and security aspects
SP  - 111
EP  - 128
ER  - 

@inbook{
author = "Mandić, Goran and Putnik, Nenad and Milošević, Mladen",
year = "2017",
abstract = "The purpose of this paper is to establish a terminological framework in order to explain social engineering and analyze it from phenomenological and security aspect. From phenomenological point of view, the paper explains the phenomenon of social engineering as a contemporary, specific and sophisticated manner of manipulating people. Social engineering is characterized by attacker’s innovative method of selecting and approaching the victim and, when needed, an unlimited number of attack cycles, depending on the goal set by the attacker. Attacks are based on the use of various tools and techniques. From the aspect of security, social engineering holds a very important place in planning and executing cyber-attacks. This paper analyzes perpetrators’ criminogenic and motivational factors from the criminological point of view. Motive and profile of perpetrators cannot always be established due to spatial and temporal limitations, as well as architectural and environmental characteristics of the information and communication system, which is the final target of the attacks. Regardless of the fact that it is present in each phase of a cyber-attack, social engineering is always the foundation of the first phase, in which the attacker learns in details the information which will facilitate access to the information and communication system he plans to attack. In this initial and crucial phase, preconditions for successful continuation and termination of the cyber-attack are realized. At the end of the paper, there is a detailed classification of threat subjects based on motives that moves them and the goal that is supposed to be achieved. In the scientific and professional thematization, this has not been done yet.",
publisher = "Nova Science Publishers, Inc.",
journal = "Security Risks: Assessment, Management and Current Challenges",
booktitle = "Contemporary deception techniques: Social engineering – semantic, phenomenological and security aspects",
pages = "111-128"
}

Mandić, G., Putnik, N.,& Milošević, M.. (2017). Contemporary deception techniques: Social engineering – semantic, phenomenological and security aspects. in Security Risks: Assessment, Management and Current Challenges
Nova Science Publishers, Inc.., 111-128.

Mandić G, Putnik N, Milošević M. Contemporary deception techniques: Social engineering – semantic, phenomenological and security aspects. in Security Risks: Assessment, Management and Current Challenges. 2017;:111-128..

Mandić, Goran, Putnik, Nenad, Milošević, Mladen, "Contemporary deception techniques: Social engineering – semantic, phenomenological and security aspects" in Security Risks: Assessment, Management and Current Challenges (2017):111-128.

TY  - CONF
AU  - Jeftić, Zoran
AU  - Mandić, Goran
PY  - 2017
UR  - https://rhinosec.fb.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/344
AB  - Th   e  relatively  predictable  nature  of  international  relations  has  changed,  and  today’s  strategic  planners  must  take  into  consideration  a  large  number  of  related  security  issues  starting  primarily  from  globalization  as  the  dominant  process  in  the  international  community. Faced with new challenges and threats, the post-modern society is obliged to make  some  changes  of  military  missions  from  classical  towards  non-traditional  missions  for preservation and building of peace and its use in its own territory as a complement to civilian  resources  in  cases  of  various  crisis  situations.  Inevitably  the  question  is  what  new  asymmetric security challenges brought and where they settled Army as a pillar of national internal and external security. Th  e new security reality also brings about a higher degree of interdependence between civilian andmilitary actors.Th  ese  changes  result  in  a  phenomenon  that  might  be  called  a  post-modern  paradox  –  connecting and distancing of the armed forces from the society. And as the fi  rst is caused by the mixing of internal and external security risks, and by increasing cooperation between military and  civilian  institutions,  the  second  segment  is  caused  by  inevitable  professionalization  of  the  army  and  its  transition  to  international  missions.  Th   e  given  situation  Charles  Moskos  represents  in  the  following  way  “the  perceptions  of  threats  and  opportunities  presented  in  the  light  of  the  international  situation  shaped  by  military  forces,  military  missions,  and  the  relationship of the military in society.”Th  e wave of migrants, as a result of the war in the Middle East, has opened the Balkan route as the main entrance of migrants to Western Europe. Large infl  ux of migrants, imposed this issue as fi rst-class security problem, which caused strain of all resources of the state at the specifi ed route and the involvement of the army in its peacetime mission assistance to civil authorities in  emergencies.  Th   is  fact  showed  that  the  army,  with  its  organization,  status,  reputation,  resources represents the pillar of the existence of internal security.Starting  with  the  request  that  the  army  should  have  the  ability  to  ensure  compatibility  with  civil factors within the overall national security forces, modular military structure for missions in emergencies can be an option for adequate response.
PB  - Belgrade : University of Belgrade - Faculty of Security Studies - Human Research Center
C3  - 3rd International Conference on Human Security
T1  - Use of Armed Forces in Emergency Situation
SP  - 245
EP  - 256
ER  - 

@conference{
author = "Jeftić, Zoran and Mandić, Goran",
year = "2017",
abstract = "Th   e  relatively  predictable  nature  of  international  relations  has  changed,  and  today’s  strategic  planners  must  take  into  consideration  a  large  number  of  related  security  issues  starting  primarily  from  globalization  as  the  dominant  process  in  the  international  community. Faced with new challenges and threats, the post-modern society is obliged to make  some  changes  of  military  missions  from  classical  towards  non-traditional  missions  for preservation and building of peace and its use in its own territory as a complement to civilian  resources  in  cases  of  various  crisis  situations.  Inevitably  the  question  is  what  new  asymmetric security challenges brought and where they settled Army as a pillar of national internal and external security. Th  e new security reality also brings about a higher degree of interdependence between civilian andmilitary actors.Th  ese  changes  result  in  a  phenomenon  that  might  be  called  a  post-modern  paradox  –  connecting and distancing of the armed forces from the society. And as the fi  rst is caused by the mixing of internal and external security risks, and by increasing cooperation between military and  civilian  institutions,  the  second  segment  is  caused  by  inevitable  professionalization  of  the  army  and  its  transition  to  international  missions.  Th   e  given  situation  Charles  Moskos  represents  in  the  following  way  “the  perceptions  of  threats  and  opportunities  presented  in  the  light  of  the  international  situation  shaped  by  military  forces,  military  missions,  and  the  relationship of the military in society.”Th  e wave of migrants, as a result of the war in the Middle East, has opened the Balkan route as the main entrance of migrants to Western Europe. Large infl  ux of migrants, imposed this issue as fi rst-class security problem, which caused strain of all resources of the state at the specifi ed route and the involvement of the army in its peacetime mission assistance to civil authorities in  emergencies.  Th   is  fact  showed  that  the  army,  with  its  organization,  status,  reputation,  resources represents the pillar of the existence of internal security.Starting  with  the  request  that  the  army  should  have  the  ability  to  ensure  compatibility  with  civil factors within the overall national security forces, modular military structure for missions in emergencies can be an option for adequate response.",
publisher = "Belgrade : University of Belgrade - Faculty of Security Studies - Human Research Center",
journal = "3rd International Conference on Human Security",
title = "Use of Armed Forces in Emergency Situation",
pages = "245-256"
}

Jeftić, Z.,& Mandić, G.. (2017). Use of Armed Forces in Emergency Situation. in 3rd International Conference on Human Security
Belgrade : University of Belgrade - Faculty of Security Studies - Human Research Center., 245-256.

Jeftić Z, Mandić G. Use of Armed Forces in Emergency Situation. in 3rd International Conference on Human Security. 2017;:245-256..

Jeftić, Zoran, Mandić, Goran, "Use of Armed Forces in Emergency Situation" in 3rd International Conference on Human Security (2017):245-256.

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Milosavljević, Slađan
AU  - Tomić, Duško
AU  - Mandić, Goran
PY  - 2016
UR  - https://rhinosec.fb.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/318
AB  - At the beginning of the 21st century, a matter of achieving the energy security, as an essentially important element of the global security system, has become one of the priorities of global politics. This has caused it to become more topical and increased its importance in international relations. The possession of energy reserves provides nations with a number of comparative advantages in contemporary international politics, and with a place among the leading centers of power on a planetary level. This fact gives a special meaning to energy security, because energy resources are an important lever by which nations project their power and influence. The correlation between energy resources and the strengthening of positions and roles of nations in international politics is undeniable and easily verifiable. The paper analyzes and partly explains various attempts to theoretically define the concept of energy security in the context of its growing importance in international relations and the impact on the strengthening of the projected positions of nations as subjects of international order. Nominal definition of the concept of “energy security” has been made more difficult by the fact that there is no universally acceptable definition of the concept of “security”, as well as that there coexist various theoretical approaches to its definition. In the scientific and technical literature, the prevalent concept is that the content and scope of the concept of security today have been substantially expanded due to the continued widening of the limits of its problem framework. The basic characteristics of most of these definitions are non-equivalence – disproportionality and inadequacy. Namely, they are either too narrow and do not include all the contents and essential factors of the security, or they are too wide, and the concept is lost in the range of phenomena. Therefore, in the conceptual sense this term is so debatable that it is not even closely possible to reach an agreement on its meaning. The attempt to define the syntagm of “energy security” reveals the same tendencies as in determining the meaning of the term “security”. Namely, there is a proliferation of different theoretical approaches, as well as differences in the definition of this syntagm, which are substantially determined by, among other things, the status that individual nations have in the global energy system.
AB  - Početkom XXI veka jedan od prioriteta globalne politike postalo je pitanje ostvarivanja energetske bezbednosti, kao suštinski važnog elemenata sistema globalne bezbednosti, što je uslovilo njenu aktuelizaciju i porast značaja u međunarodnim odnosima. Posedovanje rezervi energenata omogućava državama niz komparativnih prednosti u savremenoj međunarodnoj politici i obezbeđuje im mesto među vodećim centrima moći na planetarnom nivou. Ova činjenica energetskoj bezbednosti daje posebnu dimenziju, jer energetski resursi predstavljaju značajnu polugu kojom države projektuju svoju moć i uticaj. Korelacija između energetskih resursa i jačanja pozicija i uloga država u međunarodnoj politici je nesporna i lako dokaziva. U radu su analizirani i delom objašnjeni različiti pokušaji teorijskog definisanja pojma energetske bezbednosti u kontekstu porasta njenog značaja u međunarodnim odnosima i uticaja na jačanje projektovanih pozicija država kao subjekata međunarodnog poretka. Nominalno definisanje pojma “energetska bezbednost” otežano je činjenicom da ne postoji univerzalno prihvatljiva definicija pojma “bezbednost”, kao i da egzistiraju različiti teorijski pristupi u njegovom definisanju. U naučno-stručnoj literaturi preovladava shvatanje da su sadržaj i obim pojma bezbednost danas suštinski prošireni usled stalnog širenja granica njenog problemskog polja. Osnovne odlike najvećeg broja tih definicija su neekvivalentnost - nesrazmernost i neadekvatnost. Naime, ili su preuske i ne obuhvataju sve sadržaje i bitne činioce bezbednosti, ili su preširoke, pa se pojam gubi u širini pojava. Stoga je u konceptualnom smislu ovaj pojam toliko sporan da nije ni približno moguće postići saglasnost oko njegovog značenja. Pri pokušaju definisanja sintagme “energetska bezbednost” primećuju su tendencije kao i pri određivanju značenja pojma “bezbednost”. Naime, postoji proliferacija različitih teorijskih pristupa , kao i razlike u definisanju ove sintagme koje su u znatnoj meri determinisane, pored ostalog, i statusom koji pojedine države imaju u globalnom energetskom sistemu.
PB  - Ministarstvo odbrane Srbije - Vojnoizdavački zavod, Beograd
T2  - Vojno delo
T1  - Attempts to theoretically define the concept of energy security as a factor in the determination of the international political and security system
T1  - Pokušaji teorijskog određenja pojma energetske bezbednosti kao činioca determinacije međunarodnog političko-bezbednosnog sistema
VL  - 68
IS  - 5
SP  - 106
EP  - 123
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Milosavljević, Slađan and Tomić, Duško and Mandić, Goran",
year = "2016",
abstract = "At the beginning of the 21st century, a matter of achieving the energy security, as an essentially important element of the global security system, has become one of the priorities of global politics. This has caused it to become more topical and increased its importance in international relations. The possession of energy reserves provides nations with a number of comparative advantages in contemporary international politics, and with a place among the leading centers of power on a planetary level. This fact gives a special meaning to energy security, because energy resources are an important lever by which nations project their power and influence. The correlation between energy resources and the strengthening of positions and roles of nations in international politics is undeniable and easily verifiable. The paper analyzes and partly explains various attempts to theoretically define the concept of energy security in the context of its growing importance in international relations and the impact on the strengthening of the projected positions of nations as subjects of international order. Nominal definition of the concept of “energy security” has been made more difficult by the fact that there is no universally acceptable definition of the concept of “security”, as well as that there coexist various theoretical approaches to its definition. In the scientific and technical literature, the prevalent concept is that the content and scope of the concept of security today have been substantially expanded due to the continued widening of the limits of its problem framework. The basic characteristics of most of these definitions are non-equivalence – disproportionality and inadequacy. Namely, they are either too narrow and do not include all the contents and essential factors of the security, or they are too wide, and the concept is lost in the range of phenomena. Therefore, in the conceptual sense this term is so debatable that it is not even closely possible to reach an agreement on its meaning. The attempt to define the syntagm of “energy security” reveals the same tendencies as in determining the meaning of the term “security”. Namely, there is a proliferation of different theoretical approaches, as well as differences in the definition of this syntagm, which are substantially determined by, among other things, the status that individual nations have in the global energy system., Početkom XXI veka jedan od prioriteta globalne politike postalo je pitanje ostvarivanja energetske bezbednosti, kao suštinski važnog elemenata sistema globalne bezbednosti, što je uslovilo njenu aktuelizaciju i porast značaja u međunarodnim odnosima. Posedovanje rezervi energenata omogućava državama niz komparativnih prednosti u savremenoj međunarodnoj politici i obezbeđuje im mesto među vodećim centrima moći na planetarnom nivou. Ova činjenica energetskoj bezbednosti daje posebnu dimenziju, jer energetski resursi predstavljaju značajnu polugu kojom države projektuju svoju moć i uticaj. Korelacija između energetskih resursa i jačanja pozicija i uloga država u međunarodnoj politici je nesporna i lako dokaziva. U radu su analizirani i delom objašnjeni različiti pokušaji teorijskog definisanja pojma energetske bezbednosti u kontekstu porasta njenog značaja u međunarodnim odnosima i uticaja na jačanje projektovanih pozicija država kao subjekata međunarodnog poretka. Nominalno definisanje pojma “energetska bezbednost” otežano je činjenicom da ne postoji univerzalno prihvatljiva definicija pojma “bezbednost”, kao i da egzistiraju različiti teorijski pristupi u njegovom definisanju. U naučno-stručnoj literaturi preovladava shvatanje da su sadržaj i obim pojma bezbednost danas suštinski prošireni usled stalnog širenja granica njenog problemskog polja. Osnovne odlike najvećeg broja tih definicija su neekvivalentnost - nesrazmernost i neadekvatnost. Naime, ili su preuske i ne obuhvataju sve sadržaje i bitne činioce bezbednosti, ili su preširoke, pa se pojam gubi u širini pojava. Stoga je u konceptualnom smislu ovaj pojam toliko sporan da nije ni približno moguće postići saglasnost oko njegovog značenja. Pri pokušaju definisanja sintagme “energetska bezbednost” primećuju su tendencije kao i pri određivanju značenja pojma “bezbednost”. Naime, postoji proliferacija različitih teorijskih pristupa , kao i razlike u definisanju ove sintagme koje su u znatnoj meri determinisane, pored ostalog, i statusom koji pojedine države imaju u globalnom energetskom sistemu.",
publisher = "Ministarstvo odbrane Srbije - Vojnoizdavački zavod, Beograd",
journal = "Vojno delo",
title = "Attempts to theoretically define the concept of energy security as a factor in the determination of the international political and security system, Pokušaji teorijskog određenja pojma energetske bezbednosti kao činioca determinacije međunarodnog političko-bezbednosnog sistema",
volume = "68",
number = "5",
pages = "106-123"
}

Milosavljević, S., Tomić, D.,& Mandić, G.. (2016). Attempts to theoretically define the concept of energy security as a factor in the determination of the international political and security system. in Vojno delo
Ministarstvo odbrane Srbije - Vojnoizdavački zavod, Beograd., 68(5), 106-123.

Milosavljević S, Tomić D, Mandić G. Attempts to theoretically define the concept of energy security as a factor in the determination of the international political and security system. in Vojno delo. 2016;68(5):106-123..

Milosavljević, Slađan, Tomić, Duško, Mandić, Goran, "Attempts to theoretically define the concept of energy security as a factor in the determination of the international political and security system" in Vojno delo, 68, no. 5 (2016):106-123.

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Stojanović, Stanislav
AU  - Mandić, Goran
PY  - 2016
UR  - https://rhinosec.fb.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/312
AB  - Globalization as a social concept based on the principle of universalism announced the beginning of a new era and a model of international society, which would mean a sort of end of historical cycles. Optimistic faith in progress was one of the driving ideas of this, one of the most popular concepts of the global society. Proponents of globalization have claimed that the triumph of the West in the Cold War competition confirmed the superiority of the liberal model and represented a break with the real political perception of international politics. In this way, as argued, the conditions were created for the societies around the world to start their own reconstruction, creating a global culture and universalization of democratic governance, permanently overcoming war and establishing the lasting peace. The nature and dynamics of relationships in international politics unambiguously confirmed that the social and political reality has not developed as announced by the proponents of globalization, at the beginning of the last decade of the twentieth century. The modern world fell into a time of confusion, uncertainty and insecurity, growing into a global risk society. Strong rapprochement of nations, political communities and cultures and intensifying their interdependence encouraged more intense disagreement, the emergence of new national models, radicalizing definitions of identity to the most devastating forms. Globalization has not transformed the world, and the concept of global governance of the world proved to be a failed attempt, manifesting a variety of system dysfunctions. At the same time, the more pronounced interdependence of contemporary societies, based on the technological achievements of the postindustrial world, has expanded the range of issues that require the global approach.
AB  - Globalizacija kao društveni koncept koji se temelji na principu univerzalizma najavila je početak novog vremena i začetak jednog modela međunarodnog društva koji će značiti svojevrstan kraj istorijskih ciklusa. Optimistička vera u progres bila je jedna od nosećih ideja tog koncepta, pa je globalizacija postala jedan od najpopularnijih koncepata globalnog društva. Međutim, globalizacija se pokazala kao koncept koji je u najvećoj meri izneverio najavljivana obećanja. Karakter i dinamika odnosa u savremenoj međunarodnoj politici, nedvosmisleno potvrđuju da globalizacija 'ne radi', da jenjava njena snaga i da je sve manje kredibilan koncept uređenja savremenog svetskog društva. Globalni finansijski kolaps koji je pogodio svet 2008. godine predstavlja najuverljiviji pokazatelj da je veći deo globalizacije diskreditovan, a vera u ujedinjeno čovečanstvo je sve manje poželjan koncept. Svet sa globalizacijom nije postao jedan od najboljih od svih mogućih svetova, kako je najavljivano. Mnoštvo sveta našlo se na socijalnom, ekonomskom i političkom bespuću. Pokazalo se da su upravo procesi uspostavljanja svetskog društva koje bi se zasnivalo na liberalnim i demokratskim kvalitetima uveliko uticali na radikalnu desocijalizaciju prostora širom savremenog sveta i dramatičan porast nebezbednosti. Snažne manjkavosti globalnog svetskog poretka intenzivirali su brojne političke, socijalne i verske dezintegrativne procese, pa se ispostavilo da je bila pogrešna najava da je sa globalizacijom otpočela era međunarodnog približavanja. Istovremeno, sve izraženija međuzavisnost savremenih društava, zasnovana na ostvarenjima tehnoloških dometa postindustrijskog društva, proširili su spektar pitanja koja podrazumevaju globalni pristup.
PB  - Institut za međunarodnu politiku i privredu, Beograd
T2  - Međunarodni problemi
T1  - World security between the end and 'return' of history
T1  - Bezbednost sveta između kraja i povratka istorije
VL  - 68
IS  - 2-3
SP  - 151
EP  - 171
DO  - 10.2298/MEDJP1603151S
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Stojanović, Stanislav and Mandić, Goran",
year = "2016",
abstract = "Globalization as a social concept based on the principle of universalism announced the beginning of a new era and a model of international society, which would mean a sort of end of historical cycles. Optimistic faith in progress was one of the driving ideas of this, one of the most popular concepts of the global society. Proponents of globalization have claimed that the triumph of the West in the Cold War competition confirmed the superiority of the liberal model and represented a break with the real political perception of international politics. In this way, as argued, the conditions were created for the societies around the world to start their own reconstruction, creating a global culture and universalization of democratic governance, permanently overcoming war and establishing the lasting peace. The nature and dynamics of relationships in international politics unambiguously confirmed that the social and political reality has not developed as announced by the proponents of globalization, at the beginning of the last decade of the twentieth century. The modern world fell into a time of confusion, uncertainty and insecurity, growing into a global risk society. Strong rapprochement of nations, political communities and cultures and intensifying their interdependence encouraged more intense disagreement, the emergence of new national models, radicalizing definitions of identity to the most devastating forms. Globalization has not transformed the world, and the concept of global governance of the world proved to be a failed attempt, manifesting a variety of system dysfunctions. At the same time, the more pronounced interdependence of contemporary societies, based on the technological achievements of the postindustrial world, has expanded the range of issues that require the global approach., Globalizacija kao društveni koncept koji se temelji na principu univerzalizma najavila je početak novog vremena i začetak jednog modela međunarodnog društva koji će značiti svojevrstan kraj istorijskih ciklusa. Optimistička vera u progres bila je jedna od nosećih ideja tog koncepta, pa je globalizacija postala jedan od najpopularnijih koncepata globalnog društva. Međutim, globalizacija se pokazala kao koncept koji je u najvećoj meri izneverio najavljivana obećanja. Karakter i dinamika odnosa u savremenoj međunarodnoj politici, nedvosmisleno potvrđuju da globalizacija 'ne radi', da jenjava njena snaga i da je sve manje kredibilan koncept uređenja savremenog svetskog društva. Globalni finansijski kolaps koji je pogodio svet 2008. godine predstavlja najuverljiviji pokazatelj da je veći deo globalizacije diskreditovan, a vera u ujedinjeno čovečanstvo je sve manje poželjan koncept. Svet sa globalizacijom nije postao jedan od najboljih od svih mogućih svetova, kako je najavljivano. Mnoštvo sveta našlo se na socijalnom, ekonomskom i političkom bespuću. Pokazalo se da su upravo procesi uspostavljanja svetskog društva koje bi se zasnivalo na liberalnim i demokratskim kvalitetima uveliko uticali na radikalnu desocijalizaciju prostora širom savremenog sveta i dramatičan porast nebezbednosti. Snažne manjkavosti globalnog svetskog poretka intenzivirali su brojne političke, socijalne i verske dezintegrativne procese, pa se ispostavilo da je bila pogrešna najava da je sa globalizacijom otpočela era međunarodnog približavanja. Istovremeno, sve izraženija međuzavisnost savremenih društava, zasnovana na ostvarenjima tehnoloških dometa postindustrijskog društva, proširili su spektar pitanja koja podrazumevaju globalni pristup.",
publisher = "Institut za međunarodnu politiku i privredu, Beograd",
journal = "Međunarodni problemi",
title = "World security between the end and 'return' of history, Bezbednost sveta između kraja i povratka istorije",
volume = "68",
number = "2-3",
pages = "151-171",
doi = "10.2298/MEDJP1603151S"
}

Stojanović, S.,& Mandić, G.. (2016). World security between the end and 'return' of history. in Međunarodni problemi
Institut za međunarodnu politiku i privredu, Beograd., 68(2-3), 151-171.
https://doi.org/10.2298/MEDJP1603151S

Stojanović S, Mandić G. World security between the end and 'return' of history. in Međunarodni problemi. 2016;68(2-3):151-171.
doi:10.2298/MEDJP1603151S .

Stojanović, Stanislav, Mandić, Goran, "World security between the end and 'return' of history" in Međunarodni problemi, 68, no. 2-3 (2016):151-171,
https://doi.org/10.2298/MEDJP1603151S . .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Mladenović, Miroslav
AU  - Jeftić, Zoran
AU  - Mandić, Goran
PY  - 2015
UR  - https://rhinosec.fb.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/274
AB  - The new security paradigm of the modern world, created in 1990s, led to a security organization of a number of countries of the former Soviet bloc. Also evolving, at varying pace, was the contractual relationship of collective security, which, due to the escalation of activities of extremist groups on the territory of Central Asia, the deterioration of Russia-NATO relations, as well as the emergence of the US military bases in the region, resulted in a decision to form the Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO) in 2002. The basic declared purpose of the organization is a desire of the signatory countries to increase the effectiveness of their cooperation in the field of security. Established as a typical military alliance with characteristics of multifunctional organization for securing peace, CSTO aspires to the role of a regional leading organization in the field of security cooperation, with many open questions concerning its functioning and future development. Whether the new security organization raises the level of collective security of its associate member countries, and whether the said organization contributes to the security of the region and the world, only time ahead will tell.
AB  - Nova bezbednosna paradigma savremenog sveta, stvorena devedesetih godina prošloga veka, uslovila je i bezbednosno organizovanje jednog broja zemalja bivšeg sovjetskog bloka. Sa različitom dinamikom razvijao se i ugovorni odnos o kolektivnoj bezbednosti koji je eskalacijom delatnosti ekstremističkih grupa na teritoriji zemalja centralne Azije, pogoršanjem odnosa Rusije i NATO-a, ali i sa pojavom vojnih baza SAD na tom prostoru, 2002. godine rezultirao odlukom da se formira Organizacija ugovora o kolektivnoj bezbednosti (OUKB). Osnovna proklamovana namena organizacije jeste želja za povećanjem efikasnosti saradnje u oblasti bezbednosti, zemalja potpisnica. Ustrojena kao klasični vojni savez sa karakteristikama više- funkcionalne organizacije za obezbeđenje mira, OUKB pretenduje na ulogu regionalnog lidera u oblasti bezbednosne saradnje, sa mnogo otvorenih pitanja njenog funkcionisanja i budućeg razvoja. Da li se sa novim bezbednosnim organizovanjem podiže nivo kolektivne bezbednosti pridruženih joj članica i da li navedena organizacija doprinosi bezbednosti regiona i sveta, pokazaće vreme koje je pred nama.
PB  - Ministarstvo odbrane Srbije - Vojnoizdavački zavod, Beograd
T2  - Vojno delo
T1  - Collective security treaty organization between illusion and anti-NATO
T1  - Organizacija ugovora o kolektivnoj bezbednosti između iluzije i anti-NATO
VL  - 67
IS  - 1
SP  - 81
EP  - 91
DO  - 10.5937/vojdelo1501081m
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Mladenović, Miroslav and Jeftić, Zoran and Mandić, Goran",
year = "2015",
abstract = "The new security paradigm of the modern world, created in 1990s, led to a security organization of a number of countries of the former Soviet bloc. Also evolving, at varying pace, was the contractual relationship of collective security, which, due to the escalation of activities of extremist groups on the territory of Central Asia, the deterioration of Russia-NATO relations, as well as the emergence of the US military bases in the region, resulted in a decision to form the Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO) in 2002. The basic declared purpose of the organization is a desire of the signatory countries to increase the effectiveness of their cooperation in the field of security. Established as a typical military alliance with characteristics of multifunctional organization for securing peace, CSTO aspires to the role of a regional leading organization in the field of security cooperation, with many open questions concerning its functioning and future development. Whether the new security organization raises the level of collective security of its associate member countries, and whether the said organization contributes to the security of the region and the world, only time ahead will tell., Nova bezbednosna paradigma savremenog sveta, stvorena devedesetih godina prošloga veka, uslovila je i bezbednosno organizovanje jednog broja zemalja bivšeg sovjetskog bloka. Sa različitom dinamikom razvijao se i ugovorni odnos o kolektivnoj bezbednosti koji je eskalacijom delatnosti ekstremističkih grupa na teritoriji zemalja centralne Azije, pogoršanjem odnosa Rusije i NATO-a, ali i sa pojavom vojnih baza SAD na tom prostoru, 2002. godine rezultirao odlukom da se formira Organizacija ugovora o kolektivnoj bezbednosti (OUKB). Osnovna proklamovana namena organizacije jeste želja za povećanjem efikasnosti saradnje u oblasti bezbednosti, zemalja potpisnica. Ustrojena kao klasični vojni savez sa karakteristikama više- funkcionalne organizacije za obezbeđenje mira, OUKB pretenduje na ulogu regionalnog lidera u oblasti bezbednosne saradnje, sa mnogo otvorenih pitanja njenog funkcionisanja i budućeg razvoja. Da li se sa novim bezbednosnim organizovanjem podiže nivo kolektivne bezbednosti pridruženih joj članica i da li navedena organizacija doprinosi bezbednosti regiona i sveta, pokazaće vreme koje je pred nama.",
publisher = "Ministarstvo odbrane Srbije - Vojnoizdavački zavod, Beograd",
journal = "Vojno delo",
title = "Collective security treaty organization between illusion and anti-NATO, Organizacija ugovora o kolektivnoj bezbednosti između iluzije i anti-NATO",
volume = "67",
number = "1",
pages = "81-91",
doi = "10.5937/vojdelo1501081m"
}

Mladenović, M., Jeftić, Z.,& Mandić, G.. (2015). Collective security treaty organization between illusion and anti-NATO. in Vojno delo
Ministarstvo odbrane Srbije - Vojnoizdavački zavod, Beograd., 67(1), 81-91.
https://doi.org/10.5937/vojdelo1501081m

Mladenović M, Jeftić Z, Mandić G. Collective security treaty organization between illusion and anti-NATO. in Vojno delo. 2015;67(1):81-91.
doi:10.5937/vojdelo1501081m .

Mladenović, Miroslav, Jeftić, Zoran, Mandić, Goran, "Collective security treaty organization between illusion and anti-NATO" in Vojno delo, 67, no. 1 (2015):81-91,
https://doi.org/10.5937/vojdelo1501081m . .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Stajić, Ljubomir
AU  - Mandić, Goran
PY  - 2014
UR  - https://rhinosec.fb.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/265
AB  - The Republic of Serbia is one of the last countries that legally regulate the private security sector, which is a new conceptual system of the national security system. Since the law is expected to solve many issues and dilemmas, and bring order to the area, which by some accounts is a very profitable branch of economy. Expectations were that by the end to regulate issues such as: 1) the need for institutionalization of partnership between the public and private sectors for mutual benefit, 2) the need of expressing mutual interest to establish the desired condition of security in the entire society and 3) the need to define the mechanisms and authority to achieve mentioned above. Based on this, legal framework of private security should explicitly provide: 1) a new role of the private sector, 2) communication and data exchange between the public and private sector, 3) mandatory notification about prepared or committed criminal acts on which there is information, 4) cooperation in the tasks of necessarily protected facilities, 4) cooperation in crisis situations including natural disasters, traffic accidents, strikes, sabotage, terrorist attacks, etc., 5) cooperate in the selection and training of staff and 6) cooperation in planning activities and project design of security. This paper presents a critical review of some theoretical and professional controversies in the solutions provided by law, for the purpose of answering whether it is achieving the purpose of passing of such a legal act.
AB  - Republika Srbija je među poslednjim zemljama koje su pravno uredile oblast privatne bezbednosti koja je u novom konceptualnom sistemu deo sistema nacionalne bezbednosti. Od zakona se očekivalo da reši brojna pitanja i dileme i uvede red u ovu oblast koja po nekim proračunima predstavlja veoma profitabilnu granu privrede. Očekivanja su bila da se do kraja urede pitanja kao što su: 1) potrebe za institucionalizacijom partnerskog odnosa između javnog i privatnog sektora na obostranu korist, 2) potrebe iskazivanja zajedničkog interesa ka uspostavljanju željenog stanja bezbednosti u celom društvu i 3) potrebe definisanja mehanizama i ovlašćenja za ostvarivanje gore navedenog. Na osnovu toga, zakonski okvir privatne bezbednosti trebalo je decidno da omogući: 1) novu ulogu privatnog sektora, 2) međusobnu komunikaciju i razmenu podataka između javnog i privatnog sektora, 3) obaveznost obaveštavanja o pripremanim ili izvršenim krivičnim delima o kojima postoje saznanja, 4) saradnju na poslovima zaštite obavezno štićenih objekata, 4) saradnju u kriznim situacijama uključujući tu i prirodne katastrofe, saobraćajne nesreće, štrajkove, diverzije, sabotaže, terorističke napade i slično, 5) saradnju u odabiru i obuci kadrova kao i 6) saradnju u planiranju poslova i izradi projekata obezbeđenja. U ovom radu dat je kritički osvrt na neke teorijske i stručne kontroverze u rešenjima koja nudi Zakon, a u cilju davanja odgovora da li je postignut cilj donošenja jednog ovakvog pravnog akta.
PB  - Univerzitet u Novom Sadu - Pravni fakultet, Novi Sad
T2  - Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta, Novi Sad
T1  - Some controversy about law on private security
T1  - Neke kontroverze zakona o privatnom obezbeđenju
VL  - 48
IS  - 2
SP  - 131
EP  - 150
DO  - 10.5937/zrpfns48-6791
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Stajić, Ljubomir and Mandić, Goran",
year = "2014",
abstract = "The Republic of Serbia is one of the last countries that legally regulate the private security sector, which is a new conceptual system of the national security system. Since the law is expected to solve many issues and dilemmas, and bring order to the area, which by some accounts is a very profitable branch of economy. Expectations were that by the end to regulate issues such as: 1) the need for institutionalization of partnership between the public and private sectors for mutual benefit, 2) the need of expressing mutual interest to establish the desired condition of security in the entire society and 3) the need to define the mechanisms and authority to achieve mentioned above. Based on this, legal framework of private security should explicitly provide: 1) a new role of the private sector, 2) communication and data exchange between the public and private sector, 3) mandatory notification about prepared or committed criminal acts on which there is information, 4) cooperation in the tasks of necessarily protected facilities, 4) cooperation in crisis situations including natural disasters, traffic accidents, strikes, sabotage, terrorist attacks, etc., 5) cooperate in the selection and training of staff and 6) cooperation in planning activities and project design of security. This paper presents a critical review of some theoretical and professional controversies in the solutions provided by law, for the purpose of answering whether it is achieving the purpose of passing of such a legal act., Republika Srbija je među poslednjim zemljama koje su pravno uredile oblast privatne bezbednosti koja je u novom konceptualnom sistemu deo sistema nacionalne bezbednosti. Od zakona se očekivalo da reši brojna pitanja i dileme i uvede red u ovu oblast koja po nekim proračunima predstavlja veoma profitabilnu granu privrede. Očekivanja su bila da se do kraja urede pitanja kao što su: 1) potrebe za institucionalizacijom partnerskog odnosa između javnog i privatnog sektora na obostranu korist, 2) potrebe iskazivanja zajedničkog interesa ka uspostavljanju željenog stanja bezbednosti u celom društvu i 3) potrebe definisanja mehanizama i ovlašćenja za ostvarivanje gore navedenog. Na osnovu toga, zakonski okvir privatne bezbednosti trebalo je decidno da omogući: 1) novu ulogu privatnog sektora, 2) međusobnu komunikaciju i razmenu podataka između javnog i privatnog sektora, 3) obaveznost obaveštavanja o pripremanim ili izvršenim krivičnim delima o kojima postoje saznanja, 4) saradnju na poslovima zaštite obavezno štićenih objekata, 4) saradnju u kriznim situacijama uključujući tu i prirodne katastrofe, saobraćajne nesreće, štrajkove, diverzije, sabotaže, terorističke napade i slično, 5) saradnju u odabiru i obuci kadrova kao i 6) saradnju u planiranju poslova i izradi projekata obezbeđenja. U ovom radu dat je kritički osvrt na neke teorijske i stručne kontroverze u rešenjima koja nudi Zakon, a u cilju davanja odgovora da li je postignut cilj donošenja jednog ovakvog pravnog akta.",
publisher = "Univerzitet u Novom Sadu - Pravni fakultet, Novi Sad",
journal = "Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta, Novi Sad",
title = "Some controversy about law on private security, Neke kontroverze zakona o privatnom obezbeđenju",
volume = "48",
number = "2",
pages = "131-150",
doi = "10.5937/zrpfns48-6791"
}

Stajić, L.,& Mandić, G.. (2014). Some controversy about law on private security. in Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta, Novi Sad
Univerzitet u Novom Sadu - Pravni fakultet, Novi Sad., 48(2), 131-150.
https://doi.org/10.5937/zrpfns48-6791

Stajić L, Mandić G. Some controversy about law on private security. in Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta, Novi Sad. 2014;48(2):131-150.
doi:10.5937/zrpfns48-6791 .

Stajić, Ljubomir, Mandić, Goran, "Some controversy about law on private security" in Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta, Novi Sad, 48, no. 2 (2014):131-150,
https://doi.org/10.5937/zrpfns48-6791 . .

TY  - CONF
AU  - Gačić, Jasmina
AU  - Mandić, Goran
AU  - Jakovljević, Vladimir
PY  - 2011
UR  - https://rhinosec.fb.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/129
PB  - Ljubljana : Institute for Corporative Security Studies - ICS
PB  - Monterey : Center for Civil-Military Relations
C3  - Counter terrorism challenges regarding the process of critical infrastructure protection
T1  - A Possible Model of the Responses in the Republic of Serbia in the Protection of Critical infrastructure
SP  - 171
EP  - 185
ER  - 

@conference{
author = "Gačić, Jasmina and Mandić, Goran and Jakovljević, Vladimir",
year = "2011",
publisher = "Ljubljana : Institute for Corporative Security Studies - ICS, Monterey : Center for Civil-Military Relations",
journal = "Counter terrorism challenges regarding the process of critical infrastructure protection",
title = "A Possible Model of the Responses in the Republic of Serbia in the Protection of Critical infrastructure",
pages = "171-185"
}

Gačić, J., Mandić, G.,& Jakovljević, V.. (2011). A Possible Model of the Responses in the Republic of Serbia in the Protection of Critical infrastructure. in Counter terrorism challenges regarding the process of critical infrastructure protection
Ljubljana : Institute for Corporative Security Studies - ICS., 171-185.

Gačić J, Mandić G, Jakovljević V. A Possible Model of the Responses in the Republic of Serbia in the Protection of Critical infrastructure. in Counter terrorism challenges regarding the process of critical infrastructure protection. 2011;:171-185..

Gačić, Jasmina, Mandić, Goran, Jakovljević, Vladimir, "A Possible Model of the Responses in the Republic of Serbia in the Protection of Critical infrastructure" in Counter terrorism challenges regarding the process of critical infrastructure protection (2011):171-185.

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Stajić, Ljubomir
AU  - Mandić, Goran
PY  - 2010
UR  - https://rhinosec.fb.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/78
AB  - In many jobs, especially the ones where you need to get some confidential information in contact with other people, there are some forms of social engineering. Social engineering is the form of oral and gesture manipulation with individuals, aiming to impose them fulfill a kind of demands, made by the attacker. The existing problems in the confidential information protection sphere appear in the fact that behind each computer, there is a human being, as an individual, with own good and bad characteristics. Social engineering is a technique where persuading and/or delusion are used for getting the access to the computer systems. This is usually accomplished by conversation or some other forms of interactive communication. Countermeasures in fighting against social engineering are getting more complicated due to the fact that anyone who has the access to any part of the information system represents a potential risk to information security. Unlike other attacks on computers, social engineering does not refer to technological manipulation or the use of hardware and software vulnerability. Besides that, it does not demand any special technical skills and knowledge. This kind of attack exploits human weaknesses, as negligence or cooperation wish, in order to get an access to the confidential documents existing in the computer. Social engineering can be organized for the sake of profit and cyber terrorism or for the access to internal systems and confidential information. Big organizations that process and save sensitive data are the most often attacked and among them are telephone services providers, multinational companies, financial entities, hospitals Government agencies, military service and others.
AB  - U mnogim poslovima, pogotovo tamo gde treba doći do poverljivih informacija u kontaktu sa drugim ljudima, prisutne su pojedine forme socijalnog inženjeringa. Socijalni inženjering je oblik govorne i gestikularne manipulacije pojedincima sa ciljem da se navedu na ispunjenje nekih zahteva postavljenih od strane napadača. Problemi koji se javljaju u oblasti zaštite poverljivih informacija nalaze se u činjenici da iza svakog kompjutera stoji čovek kao jedinka sa svim svojim dobrim i lošim osobinama. Socijalni inženjering je tehnika u kojoj se ubeđivanje i/ili obmana koriste da bi se dobio neovlašćen pristup kompjuterskim sistemima. Ovo se obično postiže razgovorom ili nekim drugim oblicima interaktivne komunikacije. Protivmere u borbi protiv socijalnog inženjeringa su vrlo složene. Usložava ih činjenica da svako ko ima pristup bilo kom delu informacionog sistema predstavlja moguću metu napada socijalnim inženjeringom. Za razliku od ostalih napada na kompjutere, socijalni inženjering se ne odnosi na tehnološku manipulaciju i korišćenje ranjivosti hardvera ili softvera. Pored toga i ne zahteva posebne tehničke veštine i znanja. Ova vrsta napada eksploatiše ljudske slabosti, kao što su nemarnost ili želja za kooperativnošću, kako bi se dobio pristup poverljivim dokumentima koji se nalaze na kompjuteru. Cilj socijalnog inženjeringa može biti sticanje profita, sajber terorizam ili pristup internim sistemima i poverljivim informacijama. Mete napada su najčešće, provajderi telekomunikacionih usluga, multinacionalne kompanije finansijski ustanove, bolnice, vladine agencije, vojska i drugi.
PB  - Univerzitet u Novom Sadu - Pravni fakultet, Novi Sad
T2  - Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta, Novi Sad
T1  - Social engineering as the form of endangering confidential business information
T1  - Socijalni inženjering kao oblik ugrožavanja poverljivih poslovnih informacija
VL  - 44
IS  - 3
SP  - 163
EP  - 182
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Stajić, Ljubomir and Mandić, Goran",
year = "2010",
abstract = "In many jobs, especially the ones where you need to get some confidential information in contact with other people, there are some forms of social engineering. Social engineering is the form of oral and gesture manipulation with individuals, aiming to impose them fulfill a kind of demands, made by the attacker. The existing problems in the confidential information protection sphere appear in the fact that behind each computer, there is a human being, as an individual, with own good and bad characteristics. Social engineering is a technique where persuading and/or delusion are used for getting the access to the computer systems. This is usually accomplished by conversation or some other forms of interactive communication. Countermeasures in fighting against social engineering are getting more complicated due to the fact that anyone who has the access to any part of the information system represents a potential risk to information security. Unlike other attacks on computers, social engineering does not refer to technological manipulation or the use of hardware and software vulnerability. Besides that, it does not demand any special technical skills and knowledge. This kind of attack exploits human weaknesses, as negligence or cooperation wish, in order to get an access to the confidential documents existing in the computer. Social engineering can be organized for the sake of profit and cyber terrorism or for the access to internal systems and confidential information. Big organizations that process and save sensitive data are the most often attacked and among them are telephone services providers, multinational companies, financial entities, hospitals Government agencies, military service and others., U mnogim poslovima, pogotovo tamo gde treba doći do poverljivih informacija u kontaktu sa drugim ljudima, prisutne su pojedine forme socijalnog inženjeringa. Socijalni inženjering je oblik govorne i gestikularne manipulacije pojedincima sa ciljem da se navedu na ispunjenje nekih zahteva postavljenih od strane napadača. Problemi koji se javljaju u oblasti zaštite poverljivih informacija nalaze se u činjenici da iza svakog kompjutera stoji čovek kao jedinka sa svim svojim dobrim i lošim osobinama. Socijalni inženjering je tehnika u kojoj se ubeđivanje i/ili obmana koriste da bi se dobio neovlašćen pristup kompjuterskim sistemima. Ovo se obično postiže razgovorom ili nekim drugim oblicima interaktivne komunikacije. Protivmere u borbi protiv socijalnog inženjeringa su vrlo složene. Usložava ih činjenica da svako ko ima pristup bilo kom delu informacionog sistema predstavlja moguću metu napada socijalnim inženjeringom. Za razliku od ostalih napada na kompjutere, socijalni inženjering se ne odnosi na tehnološku manipulaciju i korišćenje ranjivosti hardvera ili softvera. Pored toga i ne zahteva posebne tehničke veštine i znanja. Ova vrsta napada eksploatiše ljudske slabosti, kao što su nemarnost ili želja za kooperativnošću, kako bi se dobio pristup poverljivim dokumentima koji se nalaze na kompjuteru. Cilj socijalnog inženjeringa može biti sticanje profita, sajber terorizam ili pristup internim sistemima i poverljivim informacijama. Mete napada su najčešće, provajderi telekomunikacionih usluga, multinacionalne kompanije finansijski ustanove, bolnice, vladine agencije, vojska i drugi.",
publisher = "Univerzitet u Novom Sadu - Pravni fakultet, Novi Sad",
journal = "Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta, Novi Sad",
title = "Social engineering as the form of endangering confidential business information, Socijalni inženjering kao oblik ugrožavanja poverljivih poslovnih informacija",
volume = "44",
number = "3",
pages = "163-182"
}

Stajić, L.,& Mandić, G.. (2010). Social engineering as the form of endangering confidential business information. in Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta, Novi Sad
Univerzitet u Novom Sadu - Pravni fakultet, Novi Sad., 44(3), 163-182.

Stajić L, Mandić G. Social engineering as the form of endangering confidential business information. in Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta, Novi Sad. 2010;44(3):163-182..

Stajić, Ljubomir, Mandić, Goran, "Social engineering as the form of endangering confidential business information" in Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta, Novi Sad, 44, no. 3 (2010):163-182.

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Jeftić, Zoran
AU  - Mladenović, Miroslav
AU  - Mandić, Goran
PY  - 2010
UR  - https://rhinosec.fb.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/77
AB  - New NATO strategic concept was adopted by the end of 2010. Before that, the Russian initiative for creating a new European security architecture was released. Whether the views of the East and the West in these activities concerning one of the most important issues of the present day - personal and collective security - are closer than before, and whether the world is more secure and regulated following these initiatives - time will tell. This paper does not aspire to provide final answers to these and other questions. This is only an attempt to perceive basic aspects of the existing differences between Russia and the West in comprehending the security issue, and to extend to the readers, against that background, a unique intellectual challenge and invitation to analyze on their own, through the prism of the metamorphosis of two traditionally confronted parties' relations, the contemporaneousness in the area of security. The main assumption of the problem analysis is based on the fact that the differences between NATO, USA and Europe, on one side, and Russia, on the other side, in their approaches to general problems, in particular in the area of security, are still substantial and represent a large, often unbridgeable obstacle for initiating a proper dialog. The more so because the latest initiatives, included in the new NATO strategic concept and in the Russian motion for redefining the European security architecture, unambiguously comprise an initiative and a wish for a dialog. Unfortunately, in the former practice, such efforts for the most part have not produced expected results! The Russian idea was initiated on the basis of the new Concept of the Russian Foreign Policy and coincides in time also with the process of redefining the new NATO concept, which even more points to the necessity of actual reconsideration of the existing solutions and introduction of essential novelties in this, very important area.
AB  - Novi strategijski koncept NATO-a usvojen je krajem 2010. godine. Pre toga objavljena je ruska inicijativa za stvaranje nove arhitekture evropske bezbednosti. Da li su ovim aktivnostima stavovi 'Istoka' i 'Zapada' o jednom od najvažnijih pitanja današnjice - ličnoj i kolektivnoj bezbednosti - bliži nego ranije i da li je svet posle tih inicijativa bezbedniji i uređeniji, pokazaće vreme. Ovaj rad nema ambiciju da daje konačne odgovore na ta i druga pitanja. To je samo pokušaj da se uoče osnovni aspekti postojećih razlika između Rusije i Zapada u poimanju problema bezbednosti i da se, na tom fonu, čitaocima uputi svojevrsni intelektualni izazov i poziv da kroz prizmu metamorfoze odnosa dve tradicionalno suprotstavljene strane sami analiziraju savremenost u sferi bezbednosti. Osnovna postavka analize problema zasnovana je na činjenici da su razlike između NATO, SAD i Evrope, s jedne strane i Rusije, sa druge, u pristupu opštim problemima, a u sferi bezbednosti posebno, i dalje veoma značajne i da predstavljaju veliku, često nepremostivu prepreku za pokretanje pravog dijaloga. Ovo tim više što poslednje inicijative, sadržane u novom strategijskom konceptu NATO-a i ruskom predlogu za redefinisanje evropske arhitekture bezbednosti, nedvosmisleno sadrže inicijativu i želju za dijalogom. Takva nastojanja, nažalost, u dosadašnjoj praksi uglavnom nisu davala očekivane rezultate! Ruska ideja pokrenuta je na osnovi nove Koncepcije ruske spoljne politike, a vremenski se podudara i sa procesom redefinisanja novog koncepta NATO, što još više ukazuje na neophodnost stvarnog preispitivanja postojećih rešenja i uvođenja suštinskih novina u ovoj, veoma značajnoj oblasti.
PB  - Ministarstvo odbrane Srbije - Vojnoizdavački zavod, Beograd
T2  - Vojno delo
T1  - New strategic concept of NATO and Russian initiative for change in European security architecture
T1  - Das neue strategische Konzept der NATO und die russische Initiative für die Änderung der europäischen Sicherheitsarchitektur
T1  - Novi strategijski koncept NATO-a i Ruska inicijativa za promenu arhitekture evropske bezbednosti
VL  - 62
IS  - 4
SP  - 146
EP  - 164
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Jeftić, Zoran and Mladenović, Miroslav and Mandić, Goran",
year = "2010",
abstract = "New NATO strategic concept was adopted by the end of 2010. Before that, the Russian initiative for creating a new European security architecture was released. Whether the views of the East and the West in these activities concerning one of the most important issues of the present day - personal and collective security - are closer than before, and whether the world is more secure and regulated following these initiatives - time will tell. This paper does not aspire to provide final answers to these and other questions. This is only an attempt to perceive basic aspects of the existing differences between Russia and the West in comprehending the security issue, and to extend to the readers, against that background, a unique intellectual challenge and invitation to analyze on their own, through the prism of the metamorphosis of two traditionally confronted parties' relations, the contemporaneousness in the area of security. The main assumption of the problem analysis is based on the fact that the differences between NATO, USA and Europe, on one side, and Russia, on the other side, in their approaches to general problems, in particular in the area of security, are still substantial and represent a large, often unbridgeable obstacle for initiating a proper dialog. The more so because the latest initiatives, included in the new NATO strategic concept and in the Russian motion for redefining the European security architecture, unambiguously comprise an initiative and a wish for a dialog. Unfortunately, in the former practice, such efforts for the most part have not produced expected results! The Russian idea was initiated on the basis of the new Concept of the Russian Foreign Policy and coincides in time also with the process of redefining the new NATO concept, which even more points to the necessity of actual reconsideration of the existing solutions and introduction of essential novelties in this, very important area., Novi strategijski koncept NATO-a usvojen je krajem 2010. godine. Pre toga objavljena je ruska inicijativa za stvaranje nove arhitekture evropske bezbednosti. Da li su ovim aktivnostima stavovi 'Istoka' i 'Zapada' o jednom od najvažnijih pitanja današnjice - ličnoj i kolektivnoj bezbednosti - bliži nego ranije i da li je svet posle tih inicijativa bezbedniji i uređeniji, pokazaće vreme. Ovaj rad nema ambiciju da daje konačne odgovore na ta i druga pitanja. To je samo pokušaj da se uoče osnovni aspekti postojećih razlika između Rusije i Zapada u poimanju problema bezbednosti i da se, na tom fonu, čitaocima uputi svojevrsni intelektualni izazov i poziv da kroz prizmu metamorfoze odnosa dve tradicionalno suprotstavljene strane sami analiziraju savremenost u sferi bezbednosti. Osnovna postavka analize problema zasnovana je na činjenici da su razlike između NATO, SAD i Evrope, s jedne strane i Rusije, sa druge, u pristupu opštim problemima, a u sferi bezbednosti posebno, i dalje veoma značajne i da predstavljaju veliku, često nepremostivu prepreku za pokretanje pravog dijaloga. Ovo tim više što poslednje inicijative, sadržane u novom strategijskom konceptu NATO-a i ruskom predlogu za redefinisanje evropske arhitekture bezbednosti, nedvosmisleno sadrže inicijativu i želju za dijalogom. Takva nastojanja, nažalost, u dosadašnjoj praksi uglavnom nisu davala očekivane rezultate! Ruska ideja pokrenuta je na osnovi nove Koncepcije ruske spoljne politike, a vremenski se podudara i sa procesom redefinisanja novog koncepta NATO, što još više ukazuje na neophodnost stvarnog preispitivanja postojećih rešenja i uvođenja suštinskih novina u ovoj, veoma značajnoj oblasti.",
publisher = "Ministarstvo odbrane Srbije - Vojnoizdavački zavod, Beograd",
journal = "Vojno delo",
title = "New strategic concept of NATO and Russian initiative for change in European security architecture, Das neue strategische Konzept der NATO und die russische Initiative für die Änderung der europäischen Sicherheitsarchitektur, Novi strategijski koncept NATO-a i Ruska inicijativa za promenu arhitekture evropske bezbednosti",
volume = "62",
number = "4",
pages = "146-164"
}

Jeftić, Z., Mladenović, M.,& Mandić, G.. (2010). New strategic concept of NATO and Russian initiative for change in European security architecture. in Vojno delo
Ministarstvo odbrane Srbije - Vojnoizdavački zavod, Beograd., 62(4), 146-164.

Jeftić Z, Mladenović M, Mandić G. New strategic concept of NATO and Russian initiative for change in European security architecture. in Vojno delo. 2010;62(4):146-164..

Jeftić, Zoran, Mladenović, Miroslav, Mandić, Goran, "New strategic concept of NATO and Russian initiative for change in European security architecture" in Vojno delo, 62, no. 4 (2010):146-164.