RhinoSec - Repository of the Faculty of Security Studies
University of Belgrade, Faculty of Security Studies
    • English
    • Српски
    • Српски (Serbia)
  • English 
    • English
    • Serbian (Cyrillic)
    • Serbian (Latin)
  • Login
View Item 
  •   RhinoSec
  • FB
  • Radovi istraživača
  • View Item
  •   RhinoSec
  • FB
  • Radovi istraživača
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Criminal procedural protection of juveniles: National and comparative solutions

Krivičnoprocesna zaštita maloletnih lica - domaća i uporedna rešenja

Thumbnail
2012
172.pdf (314.1Kb)
Authors
Banović, Božidar
Ilić, Aleksandra
Article (Published version)
Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
The authors consider in work different aspects of criminal proceeding protection of minors in Republic of Serbia and in several European countries. These young people can participate in criminal proceeding on the one hand as witnesses. It usually means that they are also injured but there are situations when that’s not the case. There are set of rules which refer to protection of minors in criminal proceeding when they are injured. Also some new rules which relate to measures of protection of particularly sensitive witnesses was recently adopted. These new rules offer protection for all such witnesses (including minors) regardless of they are injured or not. It is also important to protect minors in criminal proceeding when they are accused because of necessity of regular development of their personality and some special rules are established for that reason in our country. Some states of the former Yugoslavia in a similar way as Serbia regulate the protection of minors in criminal pro...ceedings, such as Croatia and Macedonia. The examples of Germany and France are also given in work. Germany is specific because of the rules which refer to the protection of juvenile offenders, while France has significantly improved the protection of juvenile victims of crime.

U radu autori razmatraju različite aspekte krivičnoprocesne zaštite maloletnih lica u Republici Srbiji kao i u pojedinim evropskim državama. Sa jedne strane, maloletna lica mogu učestvovati u krivičnom postupku kao svedoci. To će obično značiti da su ta lica istovremeno i oštećena krivičnim delom, ali postoje situacije, kada to nije slučaj. Kod nas postoji niz pravila koja se odnose na zaštitu maloletnih lica, kao oštećenih u krivičnom postupku. Nedavno su usvojena i neka nova pravila koja se tiču mera zaštite posebno osetljivih svedoka. Ta nova pravila pružaju zaštitu svim svedocima (uključujući i maloletna lica), bez obzira da li su oštećeni krivičnim delom. Takođe je važno zaštititi okrivljena maloletna lica u krivičnom postupku zbog neophodnosti pravilnog razvoja njihove ličnosti, i u tom smislu, kod nas postoje odgovarajuća pravila. Pojedine države bivše Jugoslavije, na sličan način, kao i Srbija regulišu zaštitu maloletnih lica u krivičnom postupku, poput Hrvatske i Makedonije. U... radu su navedeni i primeri Nemačke i Francuske. Nemačka je specifična zbog pravila koja se odnose na zaštitu maloletnih učinilaca krivičnih dela, dok je Francuska u značajnoj meri unapredila zaštitu maloletnih žrtava krivičnih dela.

Keywords:
criminal proceeding protection / minors / witnesses / injured / accused minors / measures / krivično procesna zaštita / maloletna lica / svedoci / oštećeni / okrivljena maloletna lica / mere
Source:
Strani pravni život, 2012, 1, 87-105
Publisher:
  • Institut za uporedno pravo, Beograd
Funding / projects:
  • Security and protection of organization and functioning of the educational system in the Republic of Serbia (basic precepts, principles, protocols, procedures and means) (RS-47017)

ISSN: 0039-2138

[ Google Scholar ]
URI
https://rhinosec.fb.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/175
Collections
  • Radovi istraživača
Institution/Community
FB
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Banović, Božidar
AU  - Ilić, Aleksandra
PY  - 2012
UR  - https://rhinosec.fb.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/175
AB  - The authors consider in work different aspects of criminal proceeding protection of minors in Republic of Serbia and in several European countries. These young people can participate in criminal proceeding on the one hand as witnesses. It usually means that they are also injured but there are situations when that’s not the case. There are set of rules which refer to protection of minors in criminal proceeding when they are injured. Also some new rules which relate to measures of protection of particularly sensitive witnesses was recently adopted. These new rules offer protection for all such witnesses (including minors) regardless of they are injured or not. It is also important to protect minors in criminal proceeding when they are accused because of necessity of regular development of their personality and some special rules are established for that reason in our country. Some states of the former Yugoslavia in a similar way as Serbia regulate the protection of minors in criminal proceedings, such as Croatia and Macedonia. The examples of Germany and France are also given in work. Germany is specific because of the rules which refer to the protection of juvenile offenders, while France has significantly improved the protection of juvenile victims of crime.
AB  - U radu autori razmatraju različite aspekte krivičnoprocesne zaštite maloletnih lica u Republici Srbiji kao i u pojedinim evropskim državama. Sa jedne strane, maloletna lica mogu učestvovati u krivičnom postupku kao svedoci. To će obično značiti da su ta lica istovremeno i oštećena krivičnim delom, ali postoje situacije, kada to nije slučaj. Kod nas postoji niz pravila koja se odnose na zaštitu maloletnih lica, kao oštećenih u krivičnom postupku. Nedavno su usvojena i neka nova pravila koja se tiču mera zaštite posebno osetljivih svedoka. Ta nova pravila pružaju zaštitu svim svedocima (uključujući i maloletna lica), bez obzira da li su oštećeni krivičnim delom. Takođe je važno zaštititi okrivljena maloletna lica u krivičnom postupku zbog neophodnosti pravilnog razvoja njihove ličnosti, i u tom smislu, kod nas postoje odgovarajuća pravila. Pojedine države bivše Jugoslavije, na sličan način, kao i Srbija regulišu zaštitu maloletnih lica u krivičnom postupku, poput Hrvatske i Makedonije. U radu su navedeni i primeri Nemačke i Francuske. Nemačka je specifična zbog pravila koja se odnose na zaštitu maloletnih učinilaca krivičnih dela, dok je Francuska u značajnoj meri unapredila zaštitu maloletnih žrtava krivičnih dela.
PB  - Institut za uporedno pravo, Beograd
T2  - Strani pravni život
T1  - Criminal procedural protection of juveniles: National and comparative solutions
T1  - Krivičnoprocesna zaštita maloletnih lica - domaća i uporedna rešenja
IS  - 1
SP  - 87
EP  - 105
UR  - conv_19
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Banović, Božidar and Ilić, Aleksandra",
year = "2012",
abstract = "The authors consider in work different aspects of criminal proceeding protection of minors in Republic of Serbia and in several European countries. These young people can participate in criminal proceeding on the one hand as witnesses. It usually means that they are also injured but there are situations when that’s not the case. There are set of rules which refer to protection of minors in criminal proceeding when they are injured. Also some new rules which relate to measures of protection of particularly sensitive witnesses was recently adopted. These new rules offer protection for all such witnesses (including minors) regardless of they are injured or not. It is also important to protect minors in criminal proceeding when they are accused because of necessity of regular development of their personality and some special rules are established for that reason in our country. Some states of the former Yugoslavia in a similar way as Serbia regulate the protection of minors in criminal proceedings, such as Croatia and Macedonia. The examples of Germany and France are also given in work. Germany is specific because of the rules which refer to the protection of juvenile offenders, while France has significantly improved the protection of juvenile victims of crime., U radu autori razmatraju različite aspekte krivičnoprocesne zaštite maloletnih lica u Republici Srbiji kao i u pojedinim evropskim državama. Sa jedne strane, maloletna lica mogu učestvovati u krivičnom postupku kao svedoci. To će obično značiti da su ta lica istovremeno i oštećena krivičnim delom, ali postoje situacije, kada to nije slučaj. Kod nas postoji niz pravila koja se odnose na zaštitu maloletnih lica, kao oštećenih u krivičnom postupku. Nedavno su usvojena i neka nova pravila koja se tiču mera zaštite posebno osetljivih svedoka. Ta nova pravila pružaju zaštitu svim svedocima (uključujući i maloletna lica), bez obzira da li su oštećeni krivičnim delom. Takođe je važno zaštititi okrivljena maloletna lica u krivičnom postupku zbog neophodnosti pravilnog razvoja njihove ličnosti, i u tom smislu, kod nas postoje odgovarajuća pravila. Pojedine države bivše Jugoslavije, na sličan način, kao i Srbija regulišu zaštitu maloletnih lica u krivičnom postupku, poput Hrvatske i Makedonije. U radu su navedeni i primeri Nemačke i Francuske. Nemačka je specifična zbog pravila koja se odnose na zaštitu maloletnih učinilaca krivičnih dela, dok je Francuska u značajnoj meri unapredila zaštitu maloletnih žrtava krivičnih dela.",
publisher = "Institut za uporedno pravo, Beograd",
journal = "Strani pravni život",
title = "Criminal procedural protection of juveniles: National and comparative solutions, Krivičnoprocesna zaštita maloletnih lica - domaća i uporedna rešenja",
number = "1",
pages = "87-105",
url = "conv_19"
}
Banović, B.,& Ilić, A.. (2012). Criminal procedural protection of juveniles: National and comparative solutions. in Strani pravni život
Institut za uporedno pravo, Beograd.(1), 87-105.
conv_19
Banović B, Ilić A. Criminal procedural protection of juveniles: National and comparative solutions. in Strani pravni život. 2012;(1):87-105.
conv_19 .
Banović, Božidar, Ilić, Aleksandra, "Criminal procedural protection of juveniles: National and comparative solutions" in Strani pravni život, no. 1 (2012):87-105,
conv_19 .

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
About the RhinoSec Repository | Send Feedback

OpenAIRERCUB
 

 

All of DSpaceCommunitiesAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis institutionAuthorsTitlesSubjects

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
About the RhinoSec Repository | Send Feedback

OpenAIRERCUB