RhinoSec - Repository of the Faculty of Security Studies
University of Belgrade, Faculty of Security Studies
    • English
    • Српски
    • Српски (Serbia)
  • English 
    • English
    • Serbian (Cyrillic)
    • Serbian (Latin)
  • Login
View Item 
  •   RhinoSec
  • FB
  • Radovi istraživača
  • View Item
  •   RhinoSec
  • FB
  • Radovi istraživača
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Specific features of crisis decision making

Specifičnosti kriznog odlučivanja

Thumbnail
2011
112.pdf (389.8Kb)
Authors
Kešetović, Želimir
Đorđević, Ivica
Article (Published version)
Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
The authors analyze specific features of the crisis decision making, addressing special attention to the trend of the centralization of crisis decision making as the way how bureaucratic organizations adjust to crisis situations. Alternatives to the centralization of crisis decision making are also discussed. The authors find that the centralization of crisis decision making has serious deficiencies, and consequently some researchers recommended alternative ways of structuring the crisis response, especially in inter-organizational environment. They conclude that these alternative models may help a balanced evaluation of functionality and dysfunctionality of the centralization, and that the analysis may identify personal, organizational and inter-organizational prerequisites for effective crisis management in different situations.
Autori analiziraju specifičnosti kriznog odlučivanja, pri čemu posebnu pažnju posvećuju tendenciji centralizacije kriznog odlučivanja kao načinu na koji se birokratske organizacije prilagođavaju kriznim situacijama. Razmatraju se i alternative centralizaciji kriznog odlučivanja. Autori ocenjuju da centralizacija kriznog odlučivanja ima ozbiljne nedostatke, usled čega su neki istraživači preporučivali alternativne puteve strukturiranja kriznog odgovora, naročito u međuorganizacijskom okruženju. Oni zaključuju da ovi alternativni modeli mogu pomoći izbalansiranoj proceni funkcionalnosti i disfunkcionalnosti centralizacije, te da se analizom mogu utvrditi lični, organizacioni i međuorganizacijski preduslovi za efektivan krizni menadžment u različitim situacijama.
Keywords:
crisis / crisis management / crisis decision making / centralization / kriza / krizni menadžment / krizno odlučivanje / centralizacija
Source:
Vojno delo, 2011, 63, 3, 342-363
Publisher:
  • Ministarstvo odbrane Srbije - Vojnoizdavački zavod, Beograd
Funding / projects:
  • Security and protection of organization and functioning of the educational system in the Republic of Serbia (basic precepts, principles, protocols, procedures and means) (RS-47017)

ISSN: 0042-8426

[ Google Scholar ]
URI
https://rhinosec.fb.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/115
Collections
  • Radovi istraživača
Institution/Community
FB
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Kešetović, Želimir
AU  - Đorđević, Ivica
PY  - 2011
UR  - https://rhinosec.fb.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/115
AB  - The authors analyze specific features of the crisis decision making, addressing special attention to the trend of the centralization of crisis decision making as the way how bureaucratic organizations adjust to crisis situations. Alternatives to the centralization of crisis decision making are also discussed. The authors find that the centralization of crisis decision making has serious deficiencies, and consequently some researchers recommended alternative ways of structuring the crisis response, especially in inter-organizational environment. They conclude that these alternative models may help a balanced evaluation of functionality and dysfunctionality of the centralization, and that the analysis may identify personal, organizational and inter-organizational prerequisites for effective crisis management in different situations.
AB  - Autori analiziraju specifičnosti kriznog odlučivanja, pri čemu posebnu pažnju posvećuju tendenciji centralizacije kriznog odlučivanja kao načinu na koji se birokratske organizacije prilagođavaju kriznim situacijama. Razmatraju se i alternative centralizaciji kriznog odlučivanja. Autori ocenjuju da centralizacija kriznog odlučivanja ima ozbiljne nedostatke, usled čega su neki istraživači preporučivali alternativne puteve strukturiranja kriznog odgovora, naročito u međuorganizacijskom okruženju. Oni zaključuju da ovi alternativni modeli mogu pomoći izbalansiranoj proceni funkcionalnosti i disfunkcionalnosti centralizacije, te da se analizom mogu utvrditi lični, organizacioni i međuorganizacijski preduslovi za efektivan krizni menadžment u različitim situacijama.
PB  - Ministarstvo odbrane Srbije - Vojnoizdavački zavod, Beograd
T2  - Vojno delo
T1  - Specific features of crisis decision making
T1  - Specifičnosti kriznog odlučivanja
VL  - 63
IS  - 3
SP  - 342
EP  - 363
UR  - conv_47
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Kešetović, Želimir and Đorđević, Ivica",
year = "2011",
abstract = "The authors analyze specific features of the crisis decision making, addressing special attention to the trend of the centralization of crisis decision making as the way how bureaucratic organizations adjust to crisis situations. Alternatives to the centralization of crisis decision making are also discussed. The authors find that the centralization of crisis decision making has serious deficiencies, and consequently some researchers recommended alternative ways of structuring the crisis response, especially in inter-organizational environment. They conclude that these alternative models may help a balanced evaluation of functionality and dysfunctionality of the centralization, and that the analysis may identify personal, organizational and inter-organizational prerequisites for effective crisis management in different situations., Autori analiziraju specifičnosti kriznog odlučivanja, pri čemu posebnu pažnju posvećuju tendenciji centralizacije kriznog odlučivanja kao načinu na koji se birokratske organizacije prilagođavaju kriznim situacijama. Razmatraju se i alternative centralizaciji kriznog odlučivanja. Autori ocenjuju da centralizacija kriznog odlučivanja ima ozbiljne nedostatke, usled čega su neki istraživači preporučivali alternativne puteve strukturiranja kriznog odgovora, naročito u međuorganizacijskom okruženju. Oni zaključuju da ovi alternativni modeli mogu pomoći izbalansiranoj proceni funkcionalnosti i disfunkcionalnosti centralizacije, te da se analizom mogu utvrditi lični, organizacioni i međuorganizacijski preduslovi za efektivan krizni menadžment u različitim situacijama.",
publisher = "Ministarstvo odbrane Srbije - Vojnoizdavački zavod, Beograd",
journal = "Vojno delo",
title = "Specific features of crisis decision making, Specifičnosti kriznog odlučivanja",
volume = "63",
number = "3",
pages = "342-363",
url = "conv_47"
}
Kešetović, Ž.,& Đorđević, I.. (2011). Specific features of crisis decision making. in Vojno delo
Ministarstvo odbrane Srbije - Vojnoizdavački zavod, Beograd., 63(3), 342-363.
conv_47
Kešetović Ž, Đorđević I. Specific features of crisis decision making. in Vojno delo. 2011;63(3):342-363.
conv_47 .
Kešetović, Želimir, Đorđević, Ivica, "Specific features of crisis decision making" in Vojno delo, 63, no. 3 (2011):342-363,
conv_47 .

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
About the RhinoSec Repository | Send Feedback

OpenAIRERCUB
 

 

All of DSpaceCommunitiesAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis institutionAuthorsTitlesSubjects

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
About the RhinoSec Repository | Send Feedback

OpenAIRERCUB