Kosovo and Metohija Between National Identity and Eurointegrations

Link to this page

info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MESTD/Integrated and Interdisciplinary Research (IIR or III)/47023/RS//

Kosovo and Metohija Between National Identity and Eurointegrations (en)
Косово и Метохија између националног идентитета и евроинтеграција (sr)
Kosovo i Metohija između nacionalnog identiteta i evrointegracija (sr_RS)
Authors

Publications

Position of minorities in Yugoslavia(s)

Obradović, Žarko

(Sociološko društvo Srbije, Beograd, 2018)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Obradović, Žarko
PY  - 2018
UR  - https://rhinosec.fb.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/384
AB  - An important part of Yugoslavia's identity and democratic capacity, along with other features, was the position of persons belonging to minority communities. This Paper will try to establish what was the Yugoslav's minority policy like in various periods of its existence. The Kingdom of Yugoslavia had to accept the international commitments relating to the protection of minorities, but in practice it treated minorities selectively. In the socialist Yugoslavia, equalising the position of the persons belonging to national minorities, i.e. equal position of nations ('narodi') and nationalities ('narodnosti') was a part of the general state policy. Issues faced by the FR Yugoslavia (economic crisis, refugees, separatism of the Albanians in KiM, ethnic tensions, bombing of the country, etc.) reduced the level of protection of minorities and undermined the country's entire minority policy.
AB  - Važan deo identiteta, ali i demokratskog kapaciteta Jugoslavije, pored brojnih drugih obeležja, bilo je i pitanje položaja pripadnika manjinskih zajednica. Kraljevina Jugoslavija je morala da prihvati međunarodne obaveze o zaštiti manjina, ali je imala selektivan odnos prema manjinama. Za socijalističku Jugoslaviju izjednačavanje položaja pripadnika nacionalnih manjina, tj. narodnosti sa narodima bio je deo državne politike. Problemi sa kojima se SR Jugoslavija suočavala (ekonomska kriza, izbeglice, separatizam Albanaca na KiM, etničke tenzije, bombardovanje zemlje i dr.) umanjili su nivo zaštite manjina i doveli u pitanje celokupnu manjinsku politiku države.
PB  - Sociološko društvo Srbije, Beograd
T2  - Sociološki pregled
T1  - Position of minorities in Yugoslavia(s)
T1  - Položaj manjina u Jugoslavijama
VL  - 52
IS  - 4
SP  - 1171
EP  - 1195
DO  - 10.5937/socpreg52-19885
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Obradović, Žarko",
year = "2018",
abstract = "An important part of Yugoslavia's identity and democratic capacity, along with other features, was the position of persons belonging to minority communities. This Paper will try to establish what was the Yugoslav's minority policy like in various periods of its existence. The Kingdom of Yugoslavia had to accept the international commitments relating to the protection of minorities, but in practice it treated minorities selectively. In the socialist Yugoslavia, equalising the position of the persons belonging to national minorities, i.e. equal position of nations ('narodi') and nationalities ('narodnosti') was a part of the general state policy. Issues faced by the FR Yugoslavia (economic crisis, refugees, separatism of the Albanians in KiM, ethnic tensions, bombing of the country, etc.) reduced the level of protection of minorities and undermined the country's entire minority policy., Važan deo identiteta, ali i demokratskog kapaciteta Jugoslavije, pored brojnih drugih obeležja, bilo je i pitanje položaja pripadnika manjinskih zajednica. Kraljevina Jugoslavija je morala da prihvati međunarodne obaveze o zaštiti manjina, ali je imala selektivan odnos prema manjinama. Za socijalističku Jugoslaviju izjednačavanje položaja pripadnika nacionalnih manjina, tj. narodnosti sa narodima bio je deo državne politike. Problemi sa kojima se SR Jugoslavija suočavala (ekonomska kriza, izbeglice, separatizam Albanaca na KiM, etničke tenzije, bombardovanje zemlje i dr.) umanjili su nivo zaštite manjina i doveli u pitanje celokupnu manjinsku politiku države.",
publisher = "Sociološko društvo Srbije, Beograd",
journal = "Sociološki pregled",
title = "Position of minorities in Yugoslavia(s), Položaj manjina u Jugoslavijama",
volume = "52",
number = "4",
pages = "1171-1195",
doi = "10.5937/socpreg52-19885"
}
Obradović, Ž.. (2018). Position of minorities in Yugoslavia(s). in Sociološki pregled
Sociološko društvo Srbije, Beograd., 52(4), 1171-1195.
https://doi.org/10.5937/socpreg52-19885
Obradović Ž. Position of minorities in Yugoslavia(s). in Sociološki pregled. 2018;52(4):1171-1195.
doi:10.5937/socpreg52-19885 .
Obradović, Žarko, "Position of minorities in Yugoslavia(s)" in Sociološki pregled, 52, no. 4 (2018):1171-1195,
https://doi.org/10.5937/socpreg52-19885 . .
2

The role of the military in the management of crises caused by terrorist and insurgent actions

Keković, Zoran; Stevanović, Obrad

(Ministarstvo odbrane Srbije - Vojnoizdavački zavod, Beograd, 2016)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Keković, Zoran
AU  - Stevanović, Obrad
PY  - 2016
UR  - https://rhinosec.fb.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/315
AB  - Terrorism and armed insurgency are specific types of complex and politically motivated violence, and may be used individually or combined to achieve various political objectives. The fact that they are in the middle of the spectrum of conflict (between classical crime, on one hand, and armed/war conflicts, on the other hand), is the key reason for frequent overlapping of competences and responsibilities of the military and the police in managing the crises caused by these phenomena. In addition that, as regards after-effects they cause, both terrorism and armed insurgency are crisis situations per se, these types of political violence often cause the crises of crisis management too. The paper explains the nature and characteristics of the mentioned crises, as well as the impact of erasing the boundaries between security and defense on the distribution of competences and responsibilities in countering terrorist and insurgent crises. The role of the military in managing these crises is described through a system of command and control, with consideration of specific features and tasks at different levels of the crises management. Finally, the paper provides an analysis of functional needs and capabilities of the Serbian Armed Forces in the execution of anti-terrorist and counterinsurgency tasks in accordance with the strategic, doctrinal and other normative starting points, as well as the EU and NATO standards.
AB  - Terorizam i oružana pobuna predstavljaju specifične vrste složenog i politički motivisanog nasilja i mogu se koristiti pojedinačno ili kombinovano u ostvarivanju različitih političkih ciljeva. Činjenica da se nalaze u sredini spektra sukoba (između klasičnog kriminala, s jedne strane, i oružanih - ratnih sukoba, s druge strane), ključni je razlog čestog preklapanja nadležnosti i odgovornosti vojske i policije u upravljanju krizama izazvanim tim fenomenima. Pored toga što, po posledicama koje izazivaju, i terorizam i oružana pobuna predstavljaju krizne situacije pert se, te vrste političkog nasilja često uzrokuju i krize upravljanja kriznim situacijama. U radu su objašnjeni priroda i karakteristike navedenih kriza, kao i uticaj brisanja granice između bezbednosti i odbrane na raspodelu nadležnosti i odgovornosti u suprotstavljanju terorističkim i pobunjeničkim krizama. Uloga vojske u upravljanju ovim krizama biće opisana kroz sistem komandovanja i rukovođenja, uvažavanjem specifičnosti i zadataka na različitim nivoima upravljanja ovim krizama. Na kraju, analiziraju se funkcionalne potrebe i mogućnosti Vojske Srbije u izvršavanju protivterorističkih i protivpobunjeničkih zadataka u skladu sa strateškim, doktrinarnim i drugim normativnim polazištima, kao i standardima EU i NATO.
PB  - Ministarstvo odbrane Srbije - Vojnoizdavački zavod, Beograd
T2  - Vojno delo
T1  - The role of the military in the management of crises caused by terrorist and insurgent actions
T1  - Uloga vojske u upravljanju krizama izazvanim terorističkim i pobunjeničkim dejstvima
VL  - 68
IS  - 2
SP  - 146
EP  - 169
DO  - 10.5937/vojdelo1602146K
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Keković, Zoran and Stevanović, Obrad",
year = "2016",
abstract = "Terrorism and armed insurgency are specific types of complex and politically motivated violence, and may be used individually or combined to achieve various political objectives. The fact that they are in the middle of the spectrum of conflict (between classical crime, on one hand, and armed/war conflicts, on the other hand), is the key reason for frequent overlapping of competences and responsibilities of the military and the police in managing the crises caused by these phenomena. In addition that, as regards after-effects they cause, both terrorism and armed insurgency are crisis situations per se, these types of political violence often cause the crises of crisis management too. The paper explains the nature and characteristics of the mentioned crises, as well as the impact of erasing the boundaries between security and defense on the distribution of competences and responsibilities in countering terrorist and insurgent crises. The role of the military in managing these crises is described through a system of command and control, with consideration of specific features and tasks at different levels of the crises management. Finally, the paper provides an analysis of functional needs and capabilities of the Serbian Armed Forces in the execution of anti-terrorist and counterinsurgency tasks in accordance with the strategic, doctrinal and other normative starting points, as well as the EU and NATO standards., Terorizam i oružana pobuna predstavljaju specifične vrste složenog i politički motivisanog nasilja i mogu se koristiti pojedinačno ili kombinovano u ostvarivanju različitih političkih ciljeva. Činjenica da se nalaze u sredini spektra sukoba (između klasičnog kriminala, s jedne strane, i oružanih - ratnih sukoba, s druge strane), ključni je razlog čestog preklapanja nadležnosti i odgovornosti vojske i policije u upravljanju krizama izazvanim tim fenomenima. Pored toga što, po posledicama koje izazivaju, i terorizam i oružana pobuna predstavljaju krizne situacije pert se, te vrste političkog nasilja često uzrokuju i krize upravljanja kriznim situacijama. U radu su objašnjeni priroda i karakteristike navedenih kriza, kao i uticaj brisanja granice između bezbednosti i odbrane na raspodelu nadležnosti i odgovornosti u suprotstavljanju terorističkim i pobunjeničkim krizama. Uloga vojske u upravljanju ovim krizama biće opisana kroz sistem komandovanja i rukovođenja, uvažavanjem specifičnosti i zadataka na različitim nivoima upravljanja ovim krizama. Na kraju, analiziraju se funkcionalne potrebe i mogućnosti Vojske Srbije u izvršavanju protivterorističkih i protivpobunjeničkih zadataka u skladu sa strateškim, doktrinarnim i drugim normativnim polazištima, kao i standardima EU i NATO.",
publisher = "Ministarstvo odbrane Srbije - Vojnoizdavački zavod, Beograd",
journal = "Vojno delo",
title = "The role of the military in the management of crises caused by terrorist and insurgent actions, Uloga vojske u upravljanju krizama izazvanim terorističkim i pobunjeničkim dejstvima",
volume = "68",
number = "2",
pages = "146-169",
doi = "10.5937/vojdelo1602146K"
}
Keković, Z.,& Stevanović, O.. (2016). The role of the military in the management of crises caused by terrorist and insurgent actions. in Vojno delo
Ministarstvo odbrane Srbije - Vojnoizdavački zavod, Beograd., 68(2), 146-169.
https://doi.org/10.5937/vojdelo1602146K
Keković Z, Stevanović O. The role of the military in the management of crises caused by terrorist and insurgent actions. in Vojno delo. 2016;68(2):146-169.
doi:10.5937/vojdelo1602146K .
Keković, Zoran, Stevanović, Obrad, "The role of the military in the management of crises caused by terrorist and insurgent actions" in Vojno delo, 68, no. 2 (2016):146-169,
https://doi.org/10.5937/vojdelo1602146K . .