TY  - JOUR
AU  - Ajzenhamer, Vladimir
PY  - 2017
UR  - https://rhinosec.fb.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/373
AB  - The Great Debates are an important stage in the development of International Relations (IR) as a science. However, the 'exactness' of its chronology and content, as well as the precise determination of the actors and results, is questionable on several grounds. Therefore, relying on this, often contradictory, interpretations of the outcome of the Great Debates, little can be said about the current state of the mentioned theoretical dialogue. Today, IR scholars mostly discuss abandoning the idea of macro theory and the pluralistic silence in which medium‐scale theories resonate in peace. However, this 'diagnosis' still does not give us an answer to the question of who really won the fight of so‐called big theories, or which theoretical paradigm today has the greatest influence within the disciplinary field? Applying the idea of reflexivity between the theory of international relations and the practice of foreign policy, the author of this paper rejects the restrictions of the mythos of the discipline (at the center of which is the myth of the Great Debates) and turns to the analysis of international political praxis as an instrument for the identification of the mentioned theoretical impact. At the center of the analysis are the foreign policy principles of the United States, which the author reviews in a hundred‐year time interval, in particular emphasizing the doctrine of Wilsonianism and the principles of foreign policy advocated by the current US President Donald Tramp. Facing Wilsonianism and Trampism (determining, in turn, the latter as a realistic‐constructivist Anti‐Wilsonian coalition), the author offers his view of the current state of paradigmatic 'clashes' in the theory and practice of international relations.
AB  - Velike debate predstavljaju važnu fazu u razvoju nauke o međunarodnim odnosima. Međutim 'egzaktnost' njihove hronologije i sadržaja i precizno određenje aktera i raspleta, upitno je po više osnova. Stoga se oslanjanjem na brojne, često međusobno kontradiktorne interpretacije ishoda Velikih debata malo toga može reći o trenutnom stanju pomenutog teorijskog dijaloga. Mada se najviše govori o napuštanju ideje makro teorije i pluralističkom zatišju u kome u miru obitavaju teorije srednjeg obima, nema odgovora na pitanje ko je zaista pobedio u okršaju tzv. velikih teorija, odnosno koja teorijska paradigma danas ima najveći uticaj unutar disciplinarnog polja. Vodeći se idejom refleksivnosti teorija međunarodnih odnosa i prakse spoljne politike, autor odbacuje ograničenja mythos‐a discipline (u čijem središtu se nalazi mit o Velikim debatama) i okreće se analizi međunarodnog političkog praxis‐a kao instrumentu identifikacije pomenutog uticaja. U središtu analize nalaze se spoljnopolitički principi SAD, koje autor posmatra u stogodišnjem vremenskom intervalu, posebno akcentujući doktrinu vilsonijanizma i principe spoljne politike koje zagovara aktuelni američki predsednik Donald Tramp. Sučeljavajući vilsonijanizam i trampizam autor nudi svoje viđenje trenutnog stanja paradigmatskog 'okršaja' u teoriji i praksi međunarodnih odnosa.
PB  - Institut za međunarodnu politiku i privredu, Beograd
T2  - Međunarodni problemi
T1  - Battlefield praxis: The alliance of realism and constructivism and the 'fall' of liberal internationalism
T1  - Bojno polje praxis - realističko-konstruktivistički duumvirat i 'posrtanje' liberalnog internacionalizma
VL  - 69
IS  - 2-3
SP  - 262
EP  - 282
DO  - 10.2298/MEDJP1703262A
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Ajzenhamer, Vladimir",
year = "2017",
abstract = "The Great Debates are an important stage in the development of International Relations (IR) as a science. However, the 'exactness' of its chronology and content, as well as the precise determination of the actors and results, is questionable on several grounds. Therefore, relying on this, often contradictory, interpretations of the outcome of the Great Debates, little can be said about the current state of the mentioned theoretical dialogue. Today, IR scholars mostly discuss abandoning the idea of macro theory and the pluralistic silence in which medium‐scale theories resonate in peace. However, this 'diagnosis' still does not give us an answer to the question of who really won the fight of so‐called big theories, or which theoretical paradigm today has the greatest influence within the disciplinary field? Applying the idea of reflexivity between the theory of international relations and the practice of foreign policy, the author of this paper rejects the restrictions of the mythos of the discipline (at the center of which is the myth of the Great Debates) and turns to the analysis of international political praxis as an instrument for the identification of the mentioned theoretical impact. At the center of the analysis are the foreign policy principles of the United States, which the author reviews in a hundred‐year time interval, in particular emphasizing the doctrine of Wilsonianism and the principles of foreign policy advocated by the current US President Donald Tramp. Facing Wilsonianism and Trampism (determining, in turn, the latter as a realistic‐constructivist Anti‐Wilsonian coalition), the author offers his view of the current state of paradigmatic 'clashes' in the theory and practice of international relations., Velike debate predstavljaju važnu fazu u razvoju nauke o međunarodnim odnosima. Međutim 'egzaktnost' njihove hronologije i sadržaja i precizno određenje aktera i raspleta, upitno je po više osnova. Stoga se oslanjanjem na brojne, često međusobno kontradiktorne interpretacije ishoda Velikih debata malo toga može reći o trenutnom stanju pomenutog teorijskog dijaloga. Mada se najviše govori o napuštanju ideje makro teorije i pluralističkom zatišju u kome u miru obitavaju teorije srednjeg obima, nema odgovora na pitanje ko je zaista pobedio u okršaju tzv. velikih teorija, odnosno koja teorijska paradigma danas ima najveći uticaj unutar disciplinarnog polja. Vodeći se idejom refleksivnosti teorija međunarodnih odnosa i prakse spoljne politike, autor odbacuje ograničenja mythos‐a discipline (u čijem središtu se nalazi mit o Velikim debatama) i okreće se analizi međunarodnog političkog praxis‐a kao instrumentu identifikacije pomenutog uticaja. U središtu analize nalaze se spoljnopolitički principi SAD, koje autor posmatra u stogodišnjem vremenskom intervalu, posebno akcentujući doktrinu vilsonijanizma i principe spoljne politike koje zagovara aktuelni američki predsednik Donald Tramp. Sučeljavajući vilsonijanizam i trampizam autor nudi svoje viđenje trenutnog stanja paradigmatskog 'okršaja' u teoriji i praksi međunarodnih odnosa.",
publisher = "Institut za međunarodnu politiku i privredu, Beograd",
journal = "Međunarodni problemi",
title = "Battlefield praxis: The alliance of realism and constructivism and the 'fall' of liberal internationalism, Bojno polje praxis - realističko-konstruktivistički duumvirat i 'posrtanje' liberalnog internacionalizma",
volume = "69",
number = "2-3",
pages = "262-282",
doi = "10.2298/MEDJP1703262A"
}

Ajzenhamer, V.. (2017). Battlefield praxis: The alliance of realism and constructivism and the 'fall' of liberal internationalism. in Međunarodni problemi
Institut za međunarodnu politiku i privredu, Beograd., 69(2-3), 262-282.
https://doi.org/10.2298/MEDJP1703262A

Ajzenhamer V. Battlefield praxis: The alliance of realism and constructivism and the 'fall' of liberal internationalism. in Međunarodni problemi. 2017;69(2-3):262-282.
doi:10.2298/MEDJP1703262A .

Ajzenhamer, Vladimir, "Battlefield praxis: The alliance of realism and constructivism and the 'fall' of liberal internationalism" in Međunarodni problemi, 69, no. 2-3 (2017):262-282,
https://doi.org/10.2298/MEDJP1703262A . .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Ajzenhamer, Vladimir
PY  - 2016
UR  - https://rhinosec.fb.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/336
AB  - Despite the great geopolitical importance of U.S.-Turkish bilateral relations and multilateral cooperation in which both countries participate, it is noticeable that only a small number of authors outside the United States and Turkey deal with this topic directly. As both countries are considered to be important players in the international arena, such small number of authors outside the bilateral circuit can be understood as illogical in academic terms. Especially if we take into account a large number of countries which, after the adoption of Davutogluʼs foreign policy doctrine, found themselves in a stronger international interaction with Turkey. Therefore, we consider that a selective review and critical analysis of scientific literature on modern U.S.-Turkish relations can provide the possibility of a deeper insight into the current Turkish foreign policy. In this paper author gives a critical review of thirty-five academic papers. In order to facilitate transparency and more complete analysis, the author suggests a classification of papers according to three criteria: the timeframe of the paper, the attitude of the author (towards the given problem), and theoretical approach of the author. The aim of this paper is to review the literature, and enable the reader to summarize certain conclusions which then can be used as guidelines for further research of U.S.-Turkish relations, and the Turkish foreign policy in general.
AB  - Rad daje kritičku analizu dela literature o odnosima SAD-a i Turske sa ciljem da domaćoj akademskoj javnosti ponudi dublji uvid u aktuelnu tursku spoljnu politiku i tako pruži smernice za dalje istraživanje. Uprkos velikoj geopolitičkoj važnosti američko-turskih bilateralnih odnosa, kao i multilateralnih oblika saradnje u kojima obe zemlje učestvuju, mali broj autora izvan SAD-a i Turske direktno proučava ovu temu. Kako obe države zauzimaju značajno mesto na međunarodnoj sceni, ta činjenica se može shvatiti kao svojevrsna akademska nelogičnost. Naročito ukoliko se u obzir uzme veliki broj država koje su se, nakon usvajanja Davutogluove spoljnopolitičke doktrine, našle u jačoj međunarodnoj interakciji sa Turskom. Autor je analizom obuhvatio trideset i pet stručnih i akademskih radova, a njih je radi lakše preglednosti klasifikovao u skladu sa tri kriterijuma - vremenskim okvirom rada, stavom autora prema datom problemu i teorijskim pristupom u izučavanju problema. Analiza odabrane literature pokazala je kako se istraživački fokus tokom protekle decenije pomerao sa prirode odnosa dve države na objašnjenje prirode novonastalih problema, kao i da je stav autora prema perspektivama američko-turskih odnosa u velikoj meri determinisan aktuelnim sledom događaja. Autor zaključuje da se realistički i konstruktivistički pristup snažno preporučuju kao najpodesniji teorijski okvir za dalja istraživanja savremenih američko-turskih odnosa.
PB  - Institut za međunarodnu politiku i privredu, Beograd
T2  - Međunarodni problemi
T1  - How to read U.S.-Turkish relations: An analysis of scholar literature
T1  - Kako 'čitati' savremene američko-turske odnose - analitički osvrt na akademsku i stručnu literaturu
VL  - 68
IS  - 1
SP  - 24
EP  - 53
DO  - 10.2298/MEDJP1601024A
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Ajzenhamer, Vladimir",
year = "2016",
abstract = "Despite the great geopolitical importance of U.S.-Turkish bilateral relations and multilateral cooperation in which both countries participate, it is noticeable that only a small number of authors outside the United States and Turkey deal with this topic directly. As both countries are considered to be important players in the international arena, such small number of authors outside the bilateral circuit can be understood as illogical in academic terms. Especially if we take into account a large number of countries which, after the adoption of Davutogluʼs foreign policy doctrine, found themselves in a stronger international interaction with Turkey. Therefore, we consider that a selective review and critical analysis of scientific literature on modern U.S.-Turkish relations can provide the possibility of a deeper insight into the current Turkish foreign policy. In this paper author gives a critical review of thirty-five academic papers. In order to facilitate transparency and more complete analysis, the author suggests a classification of papers according to three criteria: the timeframe of the paper, the attitude of the author (towards the given problem), and theoretical approach of the author. The aim of this paper is to review the literature, and enable the reader to summarize certain conclusions which then can be used as guidelines for further research of U.S.-Turkish relations, and the Turkish foreign policy in general., Rad daje kritičku analizu dela literature o odnosima SAD-a i Turske sa ciljem da domaćoj akademskoj javnosti ponudi dublji uvid u aktuelnu tursku spoljnu politiku i tako pruži smernice za dalje istraživanje. Uprkos velikoj geopolitičkoj važnosti američko-turskih bilateralnih odnosa, kao i multilateralnih oblika saradnje u kojima obe zemlje učestvuju, mali broj autora izvan SAD-a i Turske direktno proučava ovu temu. Kako obe države zauzimaju značajno mesto na međunarodnoj sceni, ta činjenica se može shvatiti kao svojevrsna akademska nelogičnost. Naročito ukoliko se u obzir uzme veliki broj država koje su se, nakon usvajanja Davutogluove spoljnopolitičke doktrine, našle u jačoj međunarodnoj interakciji sa Turskom. Autor je analizom obuhvatio trideset i pet stručnih i akademskih radova, a njih je radi lakše preglednosti klasifikovao u skladu sa tri kriterijuma - vremenskim okvirom rada, stavom autora prema datom problemu i teorijskim pristupom u izučavanju problema. Analiza odabrane literature pokazala je kako se istraživački fokus tokom protekle decenije pomerao sa prirode odnosa dve države na objašnjenje prirode novonastalih problema, kao i da je stav autora prema perspektivama američko-turskih odnosa u velikoj meri determinisan aktuelnim sledom događaja. Autor zaključuje da se realistički i konstruktivistički pristup snažno preporučuju kao najpodesniji teorijski okvir za dalja istraživanja savremenih američko-turskih odnosa.",
publisher = "Institut za međunarodnu politiku i privredu, Beograd",
journal = "Međunarodni problemi",
title = "How to read U.S.-Turkish relations: An analysis of scholar literature, Kako 'čitati' savremene američko-turske odnose - analitički osvrt na akademsku i stručnu literaturu",
volume = "68",
number = "1",
pages = "24-53",
doi = "10.2298/MEDJP1601024A"
}

Ajzenhamer, V.. (2016). How to read U.S.-Turkish relations: An analysis of scholar literature. in Međunarodni problemi
Institut za međunarodnu politiku i privredu, Beograd., 68(1), 24-53.
https://doi.org/10.2298/MEDJP1601024A

Ajzenhamer V. How to read U.S.-Turkish relations: An analysis of scholar literature. in Međunarodni problemi. 2016;68(1):24-53.
doi:10.2298/MEDJP1601024A .

Ajzenhamer, Vladimir, "How to read U.S.-Turkish relations: An analysis of scholar literature" in Međunarodni problemi, 68, no. 1 (2016):24-53,
https://doi.org/10.2298/MEDJP1601024A . .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Rokvić, Vanja
AU  - Jeftić, Zoran
AU  - Ajzenhamer, Vladimir
PY  - 2016
UR  - https://rhinosec.fb.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/327
AB  - Background: In recent years, the concept of health security has received an international dimension. However, despite evident links between health and security the concept of health security is not used in either academic or political discourse in Serbia. It comes as no surprise then that even though the issue of security challenges is present in Serbian legislation, it has not been incorporated into the National Security Strategy, by which health threats would be recognized as one of contemporary security priorities. Methods: The method applied is descriptive and analytical, in keeping with social studies research methodology and the aims of this study. Results: The 20th and the 21st century in Serbia have both been marked by events indicating a clear link between health and security. The most telling example of this connection is the events of the 1990s, namely civil wars, sanctions and the NATO bombing. The results of our research show that poor health conditions, an increasing number of reemerging diseases and pandemics of new diseases can have serious implications for the functioning of the state and devastating consequences for its population. What is most at risk are people's lives, capability for work, the entire economy and the capacities of the army and overall national security. Conclusion: The results of this study indicate an inextricable link between health and security and the necessity of viewing health through the lens of health security and incorporating it as such into the National Security Strategy.
PB  - Iranian Scientific Society Medical Entomology, Tehran
T2  - Iranian Journal of Public Health
T1  - Public Health in Serbia through the Lens of Security: A Review Article
VL  - 45
IS  - 9
SP  - 1136
EP  - 1145
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Rokvić, Vanja and Jeftić, Zoran and Ajzenhamer, Vladimir",
year = "2016",
abstract = "Background: In recent years, the concept of health security has received an international dimension. However, despite evident links between health and security the concept of health security is not used in either academic or political discourse in Serbia. It comes as no surprise then that even though the issue of security challenges is present in Serbian legislation, it has not been incorporated into the National Security Strategy, by which health threats would be recognized as one of contemporary security priorities. Methods: The method applied is descriptive and analytical, in keeping with social studies research methodology and the aims of this study. Results: The 20th and the 21st century in Serbia have both been marked by events indicating a clear link between health and security. The most telling example of this connection is the events of the 1990s, namely civil wars, sanctions and the NATO bombing. The results of our research show that poor health conditions, an increasing number of reemerging diseases and pandemics of new diseases can have serious implications for the functioning of the state and devastating consequences for its population. What is most at risk are people's lives, capability for work, the entire economy and the capacities of the army and overall national security. Conclusion: The results of this study indicate an inextricable link between health and security and the necessity of viewing health through the lens of health security and incorporating it as such into the National Security Strategy.",
publisher = "Iranian Scientific Society Medical Entomology, Tehran",
journal = "Iranian Journal of Public Health",
title = "Public Health in Serbia through the Lens of Security: A Review Article",
volume = "45",
number = "9",
pages = "1136-1145"
}

Rokvić, V., Jeftić, Z.,& Ajzenhamer, V.. (2016). Public Health in Serbia through the Lens of Security: A Review Article. in Iranian Journal of Public Health
Iranian Scientific Society Medical Entomology, Tehran., 45(9), 1136-1145.

Rokvić V, Jeftić Z, Ajzenhamer V. Public Health in Serbia through the Lens of Security: A Review Article. in Iranian Journal of Public Health. 2016;45(9):1136-1145..

Rokvić, Vanja, Jeftić, Zoran, Ajzenhamer, Vladimir, "Public Health in Serbia through the Lens of Security: A Review Article" in Iranian Journal of Public Health, 45, no. 9 (2016):1136-1145.

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Janković, S.
AU  - Ajzenhamer, Vladimir
PY  - 2013
UR  - https://rhinosec.fb.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/220
AB  - Differencies of two entities in gaining international legitimacy and possibilities of acting are due to the two set of factors: force of the outside actors promoting and opposing them, and according to the will, behaviour and international position of the country that legally controls the territory in which entity is being constituted. Arguments they use are partially equal but many others differ. History, geopolitical location and importance of their status for the changing world order are favoring quick rise of Albanian criminal state to the prominence. Impossibility of obtaining legal secession makes pathway toward internationalisaion and seekng international confirmation of statehood – international legitimacy.
T2  - Nacionalni interes, Institut za političke studije
T1  - Razlike u sticanju međunarodnog legitimiteta Palestine i KiM
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Janković, S. and Ajzenhamer, Vladimir",
year = "2013",
abstract = "Differencies of two entities in gaining international legitimacy and possibilities of acting are due to the two set of factors: force of the outside actors promoting and opposing them, and according to the will, behaviour and international position of the country that legally controls the territory in which entity is being constituted. Arguments they use are partially equal but many others differ. History, geopolitical location and importance of their status for the changing world order are favoring quick rise of Albanian criminal state to the prominence. Impossibility of obtaining legal secession makes pathway toward internationalisaion and seekng international confirmation of statehood – international legitimacy.",
journal = "Nacionalni interes, Institut za političke studije",
title = "Razlike u sticanju međunarodnog legitimiteta Palestine i KiM"
}

Janković, S.,& Ajzenhamer, V.. (2013). Razlike u sticanju međunarodnog legitimiteta Palestine i KiM. in Nacionalni interes, Institut za političke studije.

Janković S, Ajzenhamer V. Razlike u sticanju međunarodnog legitimiteta Palestine i KiM. in Nacionalni interes, Institut za političke studije. 2013;..

Janković, S., Ajzenhamer, Vladimir, "Razlike u sticanju međunarodnog legitimiteta Palestine i KiM" in Nacionalni interes, Institut za političke studije (2013).

TY  - CONF
AU  - Ajzenhamer, Vladimir
PY  - 2013
UR  - https://rhinosec.fb.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/212
AB  - Religious divisions are an important part of the historical heritage of the Is-lamic world, which is still, to a large extent, heavy burden of mutual relations between “countries of Prophet Muhammad”. These divisions determine not only the nature of relations between Islamic countries, and the rules of the for-eign affairs “game” in the Islamic world but they also determine their internal political turmoil. The “Earthquake” of the Arab Spring which has been shak-ing the Middle East for two years now is the latest example of how divisions among Muslims create not only reality but also future of this region. Without understanding the Islamic schism it is impossible to understand the uprising against Assad in Syria or answer as to why Arab countries such as Qatar, UAE and Saudi Arabia support the rebels in that country and yet at the same time violently suppress the revolution in Bahrain. Without understanding these is-sues it would be impossible to understand the complex relationship between Saudi Arabia and Iran, two Middle Eastern states which both claim the right to be considered as the guardians of the “true” Islam. Through the lens of Middle Eastern version of the “Cold War”, an expression which can most suitably de-scribe the relationship between these two countries in the past few decades, best reflects the depth and significance of the religious divisions in Islamic world, and above all, the importance of Sunni-Shia divisions. However, it is important to emphasize that the Sunni-Shia division and the diverse consequences which this rift carries is something which is primarily related to the Middle East. This region represents both the cradle of the Islamic faith and the root of its division. On the other hand, the Balkan Muslims as authentic and “autochthonous” European Muslim populations have, until recently, nev-er faced this kind of division. After the Ottoman conquest of this part of Eu-rope a significant number of Christians converted to Islam. One part of the local Slavic population embraced the new Islamic religion and life in this region was getting, slowly but surely, a completely new and different physiognomy, marked by the spirit of the Sunni Islam. Due to centuries of stability in the Ot-toman Empire and to the lack of religious reform movements in this part of the “Islamic” world, the Balkan Muslims remain primarily aware of the Sunni Islamic teaching and practice. The other interpretation of Islam remained re-mote and exotic to them.
PB  - Beograd : Univerzitet u Beogradu, Fakultet bezbednosti
C3  - The Balkans and the Middle East: Are They Mirroring Each Other?
T1  - Western Balkans and the Islamic schisms -The case of Bosnia and Herzegovina
ER  - 

@conference{
author = "Ajzenhamer, Vladimir",
year = "2013",
abstract = "Religious divisions are an important part of the historical heritage of the Is-lamic world, which is still, to a large extent, heavy burden of mutual relations between “countries of Prophet Muhammad”. These divisions determine not only the nature of relations between Islamic countries, and the rules of the for-eign affairs “game” in the Islamic world but they also determine their internal political turmoil. The “Earthquake” of the Arab Spring which has been shak-ing the Middle East for two years now is the latest example of how divisions among Muslims create not only reality but also future of this region. Without understanding the Islamic schism it is impossible to understand the uprising against Assad in Syria or answer as to why Arab countries such as Qatar, UAE and Saudi Arabia support the rebels in that country and yet at the same time violently suppress the revolution in Bahrain. Without understanding these is-sues it would be impossible to understand the complex relationship between Saudi Arabia and Iran, two Middle Eastern states which both claim the right to be considered as the guardians of the “true” Islam. Through the lens of Middle Eastern version of the “Cold War”, an expression which can most suitably de-scribe the relationship between these two countries in the past few decades, best reflects the depth and significance of the religious divisions in Islamic world, and above all, the importance of Sunni-Shia divisions. However, it is important to emphasize that the Sunni-Shia division and the diverse consequences which this rift carries is something which is primarily related to the Middle East. This region represents both the cradle of the Islamic faith and the root of its division. On the other hand, the Balkan Muslims as authentic and “autochthonous” European Muslim populations have, until recently, nev-er faced this kind of division. After the Ottoman conquest of this part of Eu-rope a significant number of Christians converted to Islam. One part of the local Slavic population embraced the new Islamic religion and life in this region was getting, slowly but surely, a completely new and different physiognomy, marked by the spirit of the Sunni Islam. Due to centuries of stability in the Ot-toman Empire and to the lack of religious reform movements in this part of the “Islamic” world, the Balkan Muslims remain primarily aware of the Sunni Islamic teaching and practice. The other interpretation of Islam remained re-mote and exotic to them.",
publisher = "Beograd : Univerzitet u Beogradu, Fakultet bezbednosti",
journal = "The Balkans and the Middle East: Are They Mirroring Each Other?",
title = "Western Balkans and the Islamic schisms -The case of Bosnia and Herzegovina"
}

Ajzenhamer, V.. (2013). Western Balkans and the Islamic schisms -The case of Bosnia and Herzegovina. in The Balkans and the Middle East: Are They Mirroring Each Other?
Beograd : Univerzitet u Beogradu, Fakultet bezbednosti..

Ajzenhamer V. Western Balkans and the Islamic schisms -The case of Bosnia and Herzegovina. in The Balkans and the Middle East: Are They Mirroring Each Other?. 2013;..

Ajzenhamer, Vladimir, "Western Balkans and the Islamic schisms -The case of Bosnia and Herzegovina" in The Balkans and the Middle East: Are They Mirroring Each Other? (2013).

TY  - BOOK
AU  - Ajzenhamer, Vladimir
PY  - 2013
UR  - https://rhinosec.fb.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/211
PB  - Sveti arhijerejski sinod SPC, Beograd
T1  - Golgota sirijskih hrišćana - Malo poznata strana sirijskog sukoba, Kalendar Srpske pravoslavne patrijaršije
ER  - 

@book{
author = "Ajzenhamer, Vladimir",
year = "2013",
publisher = "Sveti arhijerejski sinod SPC, Beograd",
title = "Golgota sirijskih hrišćana - Malo poznata strana sirijskog sukoba, Kalendar Srpske pravoslavne patrijaršije"
}

Ajzenhamer, V.. (2013). Golgota sirijskih hrišćana - Malo poznata strana sirijskog sukoba, Kalendar Srpske pravoslavne patrijaršije. 
Sveti arhijerejski sinod SPC, Beograd..

Ajzenhamer V. Golgota sirijskih hrišćana - Malo poznata strana sirijskog sukoba, Kalendar Srpske pravoslavne patrijaršije. 2013;..

Ajzenhamer, Vladimir, "Golgota sirijskih hrišćana - Malo poznata strana sirijskog sukoba, Kalendar Srpske pravoslavne patrijaršije" (2013).

TY  - CONF
AU  - Ajzenhamer, Vladimir
AU  - Trapara, Vladimir
PY  - 2013
UR  - https://rhinosec.fb.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/210
PB  - Institut za međunarodnu politiku i privredu,
C3  - Srbija u Jugoistočnoj Evropi : zbornik radova
T1  - Turska politika prema Srbiji i Zapadnom Balkanu u kontekstu aktuelnih međunarodnih i regionalnih trendova
SP  - 1
EP  - 17
ER  - 

@conference{
author = "Ajzenhamer, Vladimir and Trapara, Vladimir",
year = "2013",
publisher = "Institut za međunarodnu politiku i privredu,",
journal = "Srbija u Jugoistočnoj Evropi : zbornik radova",
title = "Turska politika prema Srbiji i Zapadnom Balkanu u kontekstu aktuelnih međunarodnih i regionalnih trendova",
pages = "1-17"
}

Ajzenhamer, V.,& Trapara, V.. (2013). Turska politika prema Srbiji i Zapadnom Balkanu u kontekstu aktuelnih međunarodnih i regionalnih trendova. in Srbija u Jugoistočnoj Evropi : zbornik radova
Institut za međunarodnu politiku i privredu,., 1-17.

Ajzenhamer V, Trapara V. Turska politika prema Srbiji i Zapadnom Balkanu u kontekstu aktuelnih međunarodnih i regionalnih trendova. in Srbija u Jugoistočnoj Evropi : zbornik radova. 2013;:1-17..

Ajzenhamer, Vladimir, Trapara, Vladimir, "Turska politika prema Srbiji i Zapadnom Balkanu u kontekstu aktuelnih međunarodnih i regionalnih trendova" in Srbija u Jugoistočnoj Evropi : zbornik radova (2013):1-17.

TY  - BOOK
AU  - Ajzenhamer, Vladimir
PY  - 2012
UR  - https://rhinosec.fb.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/153
PB  - Univerzitet u Beogradu - Fakuletet političkih nauka, Beograd
T1  - Politički eksperiment koji traje - politički sistem Islamske Republike Iran, Azijske sveske, Centar za studije Azije i Dalekog istoka
ER  - 

@book{
author = "Ajzenhamer, Vladimir",
year = "2012",
publisher = "Univerzitet u Beogradu - Fakuletet političkih nauka, Beograd",
title = "Politički eksperiment koji traje - politički sistem Islamske Republike Iran, Azijske sveske, Centar za studije Azije i Dalekog istoka"
}

Ajzenhamer, V.. (2012). Politički eksperiment koji traje - politički sistem Islamske Republike Iran, Azijske sveske, Centar za studije Azije i Dalekog istoka. 
Univerzitet u Beogradu - Fakuletet političkih nauka, Beograd..

Ajzenhamer V. Politički eksperiment koji traje - politički sistem Islamske Republike Iran, Azijske sveske, Centar za studije Azije i Dalekog istoka. 2012;..

Ajzenhamer, Vladimir, "Politički eksperiment koji traje - politički sistem Islamske Republike Iran, Azijske sveske, Centar za studije Azije i Dalekog istoka" (2012).

TY  - BOOK
AU  - Ajzenhamer, Vladimir
PY  - 2012
UR  - https://rhinosec.fb.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/152
PB  - Center for Balkan Studies and Researches, Kirklareli University, Turska,
T1  - Zbornik radova sa međunarodne konferencije „The Heritage of History at the Balkan Wars’ Centenary: Solutions to Political and Social Issues in Southeast Europe“
ER  - 

@book{
author = "Ajzenhamer, Vladimir",
year = "2012",
publisher = "Center for Balkan Studies and Researches, Kirklareli University, Turska,",
title = "Zbornik radova sa međunarodne konferencije „The Heritage of History at the Balkan Wars’ Centenary: Solutions to Political and Social Issues in Southeast Europe“"
}

Ajzenhamer, V.. (2012). Zbornik radova sa međunarodne konferencije „The Heritage of History at the Balkan Wars’ Centenary: Solutions to Political and Social Issues in Southeast Europe“. 
Center for Balkan Studies and Researches, Kirklareli University, Turska,..

Ajzenhamer V. Zbornik radova sa međunarodne konferencije „The Heritage of History at the Balkan Wars’ Centenary: Solutions to Political and Social Issues in Southeast Europe“. 2012;..

Ajzenhamer, Vladimir, "Zbornik radova sa međunarodne konferencije „The Heritage of History at the Balkan Wars’ Centenary: Solutions to Political and Social Issues in Southeast Europe“" (2012).

TY  - CONF
AU  - Ajzenhamer, Vladimir
PY  - 2012
UR  - https://rhinosec.fb.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/148
PB  - Belgrade : Institute of International Politics and Economics
C3  - Proceedings of the Round Table Conference : The Meaning of Borders and Border Issues in the Age of Globalization : Europe and Asia
T1  - Sandžak/Raška as border area
ER  - 

@conference{
author = "Ajzenhamer, Vladimir",
year = "2012",
publisher = "Belgrade : Institute of International Politics and Economics",
journal = "Proceedings of the Round Table Conference : The Meaning of Borders and Border Issues in the Age of Globalization : Europe and Asia",
title = "Sandžak/Raška as border area"
}

Ajzenhamer, V.. (2012). Sandžak/Raška as border area. in Proceedings of the Round Table Conference : The Meaning of Borders and Border Issues in the Age of Globalization : Europe and Asia
Belgrade : Institute of International Politics and Economics..

Ajzenhamer V. Sandžak/Raška as border area. in Proceedings of the Round Table Conference : The Meaning of Borders and Border Issues in the Age of Globalization : Europe and Asia. 2012;..

Ajzenhamer, Vladimir, "Sandžak/Raška as border area" in Proceedings of the Round Table Conference : The Meaning of Borders and Border Issues in the Age of Globalization : Europe and Asia (2012).

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Đurić, Živojin
AU  - Ajzenhamer, Vladimir
PY  - 2011
UR  - https://rhinosec.fb.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/126
AB  - Different variations of Islam, Shia and Wahabi, played a key role in shaping the political systems of Saudi Arabia and Iran. On the example of Saudi Arabia we may see that the institutions of this authoritarian system w?re established under the crucial influence of Wahhabism. By adopting the Wahhabism as the royal family ideology, Al Saud’s  absolute monarchy was strengthened with religious legitimacy. Today, Wahhabism remains the major determinant of the political processes in Saudi monarchy. That can be seen best through the powers given to the clerical circles in various areas of social life, and also by the fact that the state legal system is based exclusively on the fundamentalist interpretation of Islamic religious law. On the other hand, Islamic Republic of Iran owes its current political system to centuries long tradition of Shia imamate, which, along with a brief but strong tradition of parliamentary government, formed the precondition for a unique and highly complex political system. Uniqueness and complexity of the Iranian political system is a direct consequence of inability to achieve the highest religious imperative, the rule of Mahdi (righteous messiah), which led to the creation of “The Next Best Thing” alternative - the Islamic republic as Velayat- e faqih. It is important to notice the qualitatively different manner in which Islam has been incorporated into these political systems. Although considered to be a fundamentalist Islamic order, in which sharia law is most consistently respected and implemented, Saudi Arabia, however, is a monarchy in which the absolute power is still in the hands of secular ruler. Right to pass legislation in the form of royal decrees confirmes that, regardless of his religious title, the government of Saudi king is essentially secular. Therefore Wahhabism, although it’s undoubtedly the foundation of the Saudi state, in political life of the kingdom serves primarily as a pillar of the monarchy. Islamic Republic of Iran, based on the values of the Islamic Revolution, links its political dynamics to the institutionalization of clerical positions in government structures (Fagih, the Guardian Council, the Council of Experts), and therefore we can conclude that synthesis of Shia Islam and the politics in Iran is fully achieved.
T2  - Politička revija
T1  - Uticaj islamskih raskola na formiranje političkih sistema Saudijske Arabije i Irana
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Đurić, Živojin and Ajzenhamer, Vladimir",
year = "2011",
abstract = "Different variations of Islam, Shia and Wahabi, played a key role in shaping the political systems of Saudi Arabia and Iran. On the example of Saudi Arabia we may see that the institutions of this authoritarian system w?re established under the crucial influence of Wahhabism. By adopting the Wahhabism as the royal family ideology, Al Saud’s  absolute monarchy was strengthened with religious legitimacy. Today, Wahhabism remains the major determinant of the political processes in Saudi monarchy. That can be seen best through the powers given to the clerical circles in various areas of social life, and also by the fact that the state legal system is based exclusively on the fundamentalist interpretation of Islamic religious law. On the other hand, Islamic Republic of Iran owes its current political system to centuries long tradition of Shia imamate, which, along with a brief but strong tradition of parliamentary government, formed the precondition for a unique and highly complex political system. Uniqueness and complexity of the Iranian political system is a direct consequence of inability to achieve the highest religious imperative, the rule of Mahdi (righteous messiah), which led to the creation of “The Next Best Thing” alternative - the Islamic republic as Velayat- e faqih. It is important to notice the qualitatively different manner in which Islam has been incorporated into these political systems. Although considered to be a fundamentalist Islamic order, in which sharia law is most consistently respected and implemented, Saudi Arabia, however, is a monarchy in which the absolute power is still in the hands of secular ruler. Right to pass legislation in the form of royal decrees confirmes that, regardless of his religious title, the government of Saudi king is essentially secular. Therefore Wahhabism, although it’s undoubtedly the foundation of the Saudi state, in political life of the kingdom serves primarily as a pillar of the monarchy. Islamic Republic of Iran, based on the values of the Islamic Revolution, links its political dynamics to the institutionalization of clerical positions in government structures (Fagih, the Guardian Council, the Council of Experts), and therefore we can conclude that synthesis of Shia Islam and the politics in Iran is fully achieved.",
journal = "Politička revija",
title = "Uticaj islamskih raskola na formiranje političkih sistema Saudijske Arabije i Irana"
}

Đurić, Ž.,& Ajzenhamer, V.. (2011). Uticaj islamskih raskola na formiranje političkih sistema Saudijske Arabije i Irana. in Politička revija.

Đurić Ž, Ajzenhamer V. Uticaj islamskih raskola na formiranje političkih sistema Saudijske Arabije i Irana. in Politička revija. 2011;..

Đurić, Živojin, Ajzenhamer, Vladimir, "Uticaj islamskih raskola na formiranje političkih sistema Saudijske Arabije i Irana" in Politička revija (2011).

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Ajzenhamer, Vladimir
PY  - 2011
UR  - https://rhinosec.fb.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/116
T2  - Ekonomska Diplomatija
T1  - Who are the BRIC(K)S of the ‘Bright new world'?
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Ajzenhamer, Vladimir",
year = "2011",
journal = "Ekonomska Diplomatija",
title = "Who are the BRIC(K)S of the ‘Bright new world'?"
}

Ajzenhamer, V.. (2011). Who are the BRIC(K)S of the ‘Bright new world'?. in Ekonomska Diplomatija.

Ajzenhamer V. Who are the BRIC(K)S of the ‘Bright new world'?. in Ekonomska Diplomatija. 2011;..

Ajzenhamer, Vladimir, "Who are the BRIC(K)S of the ‘Bright new world'?" in Ekonomska Diplomatija (2011).

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Ajzenhamer, Vladimir
PY  - 2011
UR  - https://rhinosec.fb.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/114
T2  - Godišnjak, Fakultet političkih nauka, Univerzitet u Beogradu
T1  - Na razmeđu kompatibilnosti i nekompatibilnosti - islam i demokratija
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Ajzenhamer, Vladimir",
year = "2011",
journal = "Godišnjak, Fakultet političkih nauka, Univerzitet u Beogradu",
title = "Na razmeđu kompatibilnosti i nekompatibilnosti - islam i demokratija"
}

Ajzenhamer, V.. (2011). Na razmeđu kompatibilnosti i nekompatibilnosti - islam i demokratija. in Godišnjak, Fakultet političkih nauka, Univerzitet u Beogradu.

Ajzenhamer V. Na razmeđu kompatibilnosti i nekompatibilnosti - islam i demokratija. in Godišnjak, Fakultet političkih nauka, Univerzitet u Beogradu. 2011;..

Ajzenhamer, Vladimir, "Na razmeđu kompatibilnosti i nekompatibilnosti - islam i demokratija" in Godišnjak, Fakultet političkih nauka, Univerzitet u Beogradu (2011).

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Đurić, Živojin
AU  - Ajzenhamer, Vladimir
PY  - 2011
UR  - https://rhinosec.fb.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/110
AB  - This paper determines, through the analysis of political institutions, as well as analysis of the key moments of the modern Turkish history, the main characteristics of the political system of Turkey. Also, the authors analyze the role of the military in the establishment and maintenance of the secular society, and try to illuminate the essence of the current Islamist shift in Turkish politics. The paper first gives a historical overview of Ataturk’s reforms and the emergence of the Turkish republic, followed by review of basic characteristic of its political institutions. Then the authors analyze the past and present role of the military in Turkish political life, as well as reform shift after the victory of Islamists on parliamentary elections in 2002. The final part of the paper raises the question of whether the current policies of the ruling AK party leads to ? greater democratization of society, its Islamization, or domination of one party over the entire political system?
T2  - Srpska politička misao
T1  - Politički sistem Turske na razmeđu kemalizma i islamizma
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Đurić, Živojin and Ajzenhamer, Vladimir",
year = "2011",
abstract = "This paper determines, through the analysis of political institutions, as well as analysis of the key moments of the modern Turkish history, the main characteristics of the political system of Turkey. Also, the authors analyze the role of the military in the establishment and maintenance of the secular society, and try to illuminate the essence of the current Islamist shift in Turkish politics. The paper first gives a historical overview of Ataturk’s reforms and the emergence of the Turkish republic, followed by review of basic characteristic of its political institutions. Then the authors analyze the past and present role of the military in Turkish political life, as well as reform shift after the victory of Islamists on parliamentary elections in 2002. The final part of the paper raises the question of whether the current policies of the ruling AK party leads to ? greater democratization of society, its Islamization, or domination of one party over the entire political system?",
journal = "Srpska politička misao",
title = "Politički sistem Turske na razmeđu kemalizma i islamizma"
}

Đurić, Ž.,& Ajzenhamer, V.. (2011). Politički sistem Turske na razmeđu kemalizma i islamizma. in Srpska politička misao.

Đurić Ž, Ajzenhamer V. Politički sistem Turske na razmeđu kemalizma i islamizma. in Srpska politička misao. 2011;..

Đurić, Živojin, Ajzenhamer, Vladimir, "Politički sistem Turske na razmeđu kemalizma i islamizma" in Srpska politička misao (2011).